OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging combined with conventional MR imaging for the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients who had undergone resection of cholesteatoma were referred for MR imaging. MR imaging (1.5 T) was performed using a diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echoplanar sequence, a proton density and T2-weighted double-echo turbo spin-echo sequence, and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences before and after IV injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg of body weight). An experienced reviewer evaluated the diffusion-weighted MR images for the presence of a high-signal-intensity cholesteatoma. Imaging findings were correlated with findings from surgery in 17 patients and with findings from clinical follow-up examination in five patients. RESULTS: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging combined with conventional MR imaging depicted 10 of 13 cholesteatomas (sensitivity, 77%). The three lesions that were missed were smaller than 5 mm. All the MR images of patients without cholesteatoma were correctly interpreted as showing negative findings for cholesteatoma (specificity, 100%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging combined with conventional MR imaging can confirm residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone middle ear surgery by showing a high-signal-intensity lesion. Because tumors smaller than 5 mm may be missed, a diffusion-weighted MR imaging study with negative findings does not exclude small residual or recurrent cholesteatoma.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging combined with conventional MR imaging for the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients who had undergone resection of cholesteatoma were referred for MR imaging. MR imaging (1.5 T) was performed using a diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echoplanar sequence, a proton density and T2-weighted double-echo turbo spin-echo sequence, and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences before and after IV injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg of body weight). An experienced reviewer evaluated the diffusion-weighted MR images for the presence of a high-signal-intensity cholesteatoma. Imaging findings were correlated with findings from surgery in 17 patients and with findings from clinical follow-up examination in five patients. RESULTS: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging combined with conventional MR imaging depicted 10 of 13 cholesteatomas (sensitivity, 77%). The three lesions that were missed were smaller than 5 mm. All the MR images of patients without cholesteatoma were correctly interpreted as showing negative findings for cholesteatoma (specificity, 100%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging combined with conventional MR imaging can confirm residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in patients who have undergone middle ear surgery by showing a high-signal-intensity lesion. Because tumors smaller than 5 mm may be missed, a diffusion-weighted MR imaging study with negative findings does not exclude small residual or recurrent cholesteatoma.
Authors: B De Foer; J-P Vercruysse; M Spaepen; T Somers; M Pouillon; E Offeciers; J W Casselman Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Anne Geoffray; Myriam Guesmi; Jean François Nebbia; Béatrice Leloutre; Sonanda Bailleux; Claude Maschi Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2012-11-18
Authors: Giovanni Foti; Alberto Beltramello; Giorgio Minerva; Matteo Catania; Massimo Guerriero; Sergio Albanese; Giovanni Carbognin Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2019-02-02 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Bert De Foer; Jean-Philippe Vercruysse; Anja Bernaerts; Joachim Maes; Filip Deckers; Johan Michiels; Thomas Somers; Marc Pouillon; Erwin Offeciers; Jan W Casselman Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2007-09-03 Impact factor: 2.804