Literature DB >> 12818601

Comparative assessment of two methods used for interdental immobilization.

Ashraf F Ayoub1, John Rowson.   

Abstract

AIM: This investigation was carried out to compare Dimac wires with arch bars for interdental immobilization.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The assessment was conducted on 50 patients who had mandibular fractures and in whom intermaxillary fixation was required as a part of the treatment. The time required for applying each method of fixation, the needle-stick injuries that occurred during their application, and the periodontal damage that followed interdental immobilization was investigated.
RESULTS: The mean time required for the application of Dimac wires was significantly less than that required for arch bars. The needle-stick injuries were significantly less with Dimac wires. Patients reported difficulty with oral hygiene with arch bars in place. This was associated with periodontal damage following removal of fixation.
CONCLUSION: Dimac wires is safer to use and less traumatic to the periodontium

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12818601     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(03)00022-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  11 in total

1.  Retrospective Study on Efficacy of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws.

Authors:  N K Sahoo; R Sinha; P S Menon; R Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  A Clinical Comparison and Economic Evaluation of Erich Arch Bars, 4-Point Fixation, and Bone-Supported Arch Bars for Maxillomandibular Fixation.

Authors:  Meade C Edmunds; T Alex McKnight; Christopher M Runyan; Brian W Downs; Jordan L Wallin
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Evaluation of two different methods of arch bar application: a comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Naveen Chhabra; Shruti Chhabra; Deepti Thapar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-07-18

4.  Maxillomandibular Fixation by Plastic Surgeons: Cost Analysis and Utilization of Resources.

Authors:  Scott J Farber; Alison K Snyder-Warwick; Gary B Skolnick; Albert S Woo; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Are Embrasure Wires Effective and Reliable Method for Intraoperative Maxillomandibular Fixation in Mandibular Fractures?

Authors:  Tejinder Kaur; Amit Dhawan; Ramandeep Singh Bhullar; Sarika Kapila; Sakshi Gupta; Ritika Resham
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2021-03-08

6.  Treatment of Mandibular Fractures Using Intermaxillary Fixation and Vacuum Forming Splints: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  D V Trupthi; Shouvik Chowdhury; Anjan Shah; Madhumati Singh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-09-17

7.  A prospective comparative clinical study on modified screw retained arch bar (SRAB) and conventional Erich's arch bar (CEAB).

Authors:  Pankaj Pathak; Shaji Thomas; Darpan Bhargava; Sivakumar Beena
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-24

8.  The use of Synthes MatrixWAVE bone anchored arch bars for closed treatment of multiple concurrent mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kiwanuka; Rajiv Iyengar; Charles Christopher Jehle; Raman Mehrzad; Daniel Kwan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 9.  Is the Erich arch bar the best intermaxillary fixation method in maxillofacial fractures? A systematic review.

Authors:  Saulo-Gabriel Falci; Dhelfeson-Willya Douglas-de-Oliveira; Paulo-Eduardo-Melo Stella; Cássio-Roberto Rocha-dos Santos
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fracture without Rigid Maxillomandibular Fixation.

Authors:  Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar; Magdy Abdalla Sayed El-Ahl; Hazem Saed Amer
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.