Literature DB >> 12818271

Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

Jason B Klapman1, Roberto Logrono, Charles E Dye, Irving Waxman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-guided FNA) is becoming a preferred modality for diagnosing and staging GI and mediastinal malignancies. Although experts advocate on-site cytopathology assessment for tissue sample adequacy, there are few data to support this claim. Our goal was to determine whether on-site cytopathology interpretation improves the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA.
METHODS: EUS-guided FNA results from two university hospital centers were reviewed and compared. At center 1, where EUS-guided FNA was performed with a cytopathologist on site, the results of 108 consecutive patients were evaluated. At center 2, where a cytopathologist is unavailable, the results of 87 consecutive patients were reviewed. One endoscopist performed all procedures at both institutions. Cytologic diagnoses were categorized as positive or negative for malignancy, suspicious for malignancy, atypical/indeterminate, or unsatisfactory. The number of repeat procedures, needle passes, medication use, target site, age, and sex were compared between the two sites.
RESULTS: Patients at center 2 were older (p = 0.04) and predominantly female (p = 0.03). Pancreas was the most common target site at center 2, whereas thoraco-abdominal nodes were the most common at center 1 (p = 0.0001). Patients at center 1 had a diagnosis of positive or negative for malignancy more frequently (p = 0.001) and were less likely to have an unsatisfactory specimen (p = 0.035) or repeat procedure, although the latter was not significant (p = 0.156).
CONCLUSION: On-site cytopathology interpretation improves the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA. EUS centers should allocate resources to cover for on-site cytopathology evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12818271     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07472.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  118 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-12

2.  One- and two-step self-expandable metal stent placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hamada; Yousuke Nakai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Osamu Togawa; Hirofumi Kogure; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Takeshi Tsujino; Naoki Sasahira; Kenji Hirano; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Yukiko Ito; Takashi Sasaki; Suguru Mizuno; Nobuo Toda; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: Relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Thibaud Koessler; Jeanin E van Hooft; Paul Fockens
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and the role of endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Linda S Lee
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-08

5.  Dynamic telecytology compares favorably to rapid onsite evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirates.

Authors:  James L Buxbaum; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Christianne J Lane; Shyam Varadarajulu; Ami Linder; Amanda E Crowe; Darshana Jhala; Nirag C Jhala; David R Crowe; Isam A Eltoum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Endosonographer's macroscopic evaluation of EUS-FNAB specimens after interactive cytopathologic training: a single-center prospective validation cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Seungho Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system.

Authors:  J Kariniemi; R Blanco Sequeiros; R Ojala; O Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Jose Antunez; Jeronimo Forteza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Brandon S Walker; Kirsten Howard; Lester J Layfield; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy?

Authors:  Fahad Alsohaibani; Safwat Girgis; Gurpal Singh Sandha
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.