Literature DB >> 12817653

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess cortical plasticity: a critical perspective for stroke rehabilitation.

Andrew J Butler1, Steven L Wolf.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation has gained increasing visibility as an evaluative and interventional tool during the past 15 years. Within the context of rehabilitation, transcranial magnetic stimulation has been applied to differentiate excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms and to assess cortical reorganization following specific interventions. This article reviews some of the more salient features of transcranial magnetic stimulation applications relevant to stroke rehabilitation, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses in this approach. Data derived from such studies may be profoundly over-interpreted. Information is provided showing the importance of utilizing fundamental principles of electrode placement and kinesiological electromyography to more accurately reflect and interpret data emerging from transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping studies, particularly as they apply to the interpretation of cortical reorganization following application of neurorehabilitative procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12817653     DOI: 10.1080/16501960310010106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  8 in total

1.  Intra- and intersubject reliability of abductor pollicis brevis muscle motor map characteristics with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Corneal; Andrew J Butler; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Effects of posture and coactivation on corticomotor excitability of ankle muscles.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; Steven Eicholtz; Bethany J Lin; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke.

Authors:  Lumy Sawaki; Andrew J Butler; Xiaoyan Leng; Peter A Wassenaar; Yousef M Mohammad; Sarah Blanton; K Sathian; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf; David C Good; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Changes in serial optical topography and TMS during task performance after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Si-Woon Park; Andrew J Butler; Vanessa Cavalheiro; Jay L Alberts; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 7.  Role of cerebral cortex plasticity in the recovery of swallowing function following dysphagic stroke.

Authors:  Andrew W Barritt; David G Smithard
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Shannon Kahn; Steven L Wolf; Paul Weiss
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.