Literature DB >> 12817358

Bias in patient assessments of general practice: general practice assessment survey scores in surgery and postal responders.

Peter Bower1, Martin O Roland.   

Abstract

Patient-based measures of the quality of primary care are increasingly important. However, their effective use requires bias to be minimised. Scores on the General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS) differ according to whether patients are surveyed in the surgery or by post. It is not clear whether these differences relate to the mode of administration or to the types of patients who complete the scale in postal and surgery samples. Regression indicates that the bias reflects both effects and should be considered when GPAS scores are being interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12817358      PMCID: PMC1314512     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  3 in total

1.  The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

Authors:  J Ramsay; J L Campbell; S Schroter; J Green; M Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care.

Authors:  J L Campbell; J Ramsay; J Green
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

3.  Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M Hann; J Hacker; C Burns; D Oliver; A Thapar; N Mead; D G Safran; M O Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06
  3 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  Matthew Hankins; Alice Fraser; Andrew Hodson; Claire Hooley; Helen Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Systematic review of patients' views on the quality of primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Daprim S Ogaji; Sally Giles; Gavin Daker-White; Peter Bower
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2015-10-30

3.  Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England.

Authors:  Martin Roland; Marc Elliott; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Josephine Barbiere; Richard A Parker; Patten Smith; Peter Bower; John Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-29

4.  Does patient satisfaction of general practice change over a decade?

Authors:  James Allan; Peter Schattner; Nigel Stocks; Emmae Ramsay
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial.

Authors:  James A Desborough; Peter Butters; Debi Bhattacharya; Richard C Holland; David J Wright
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  GPAQ-R: development and psychometric properties of a version of the general practice assessment questionnaire for use for revalidation by general practitioners in the UK.

Authors:  Martin Roland; Martin Roberts; Valerie Rhenius; John Campbell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  What are the patients' preferences for the Chronic Care Model? An application to the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Authors:  Nicolas Krucien; Marc Le Vaillant; Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context.

Authors:  Nicolas Krucien; Marc Le Vaillant; Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.