Literature DB >> 12817155

Escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is effective and well tolerated in a placebo-controlled study in depression in primary care.

Ulla M Lepola1, Henrik Loft, Elin Heldbo Reines.   

Abstract

Escitalopram was compared to placebo in moderately to severely depressed patients in primary care with citalopram as the active reference. Patients were randomized to receive flexible doses of 10-20 mg/day escitalopram (n=155), 20-40 mg/day citalopram (n=160), or placebo (n=154) over an 8-week double-blind period. The primary efficacy parameter was the change from baseline to last assessment in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. Escitalopram produced a statistically significant therapeutic difference of 2.9 points (P=0.002) compared to placebo, and escitalopram was consistently and statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo from week 1 onwards. Analysis of Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement confirmed the primary efficacy results. By week 8, significantly more patients had responded to treatment with escitalopram than with citalopram (P=0.021) or placebo (P=0.009). Escitalopram was as well tolerated as citalopram and had a similar adverse event profile. Both escitalopram- and citalopram-treated patients had placebo-level adverse event withdrawal rates (3% and 4%, respectively). This study demonstrates the consistent antidepressant efficacy and excellent tolerability of escitalopram 10-20 mg/day in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12817155     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200307000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  52 in total

Review 1.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Juan Undurraga; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  In vivo investigation of escitalopram's allosteric site on the serotonin transporter.

Authors:  Karen E Murray; Kerry J Ressler; Michael J Owens
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Ewgeni Jakubovski; Anjali L Varigonda; Nicholas Freemantle; Matthew J Taylor; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 5.  Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Ou; Guang-Lei Xun; Ren-Rong Wu; Le-Hua Li; Mao-Sheng Fang; Hong-Geng Zhang; Shi-Ping Xie; Jian-Guo Shi; Bo Du; Xue-Qin Yuan; Jing-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Henning F Andersen; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 9.  Escitalopram: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  The interaction of escitalopram and R-citalopram at the human serotonin transporter investigated in the mouse.

Authors:  Jacob P R Jacobsen; Per Plenge; Benjamin D Sachs; Alan L Pehrson; Manuel Cajina; Yunzhi Du; Wendy Roberts; Meghan L Rudder; Prachiti Dalvi; Taylor J Robinson; Sharon P O'Neill; King S Khoo; Connie Sanchez Morillo; Xiaodong Zhang; Marc G Caron
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.