Literature DB >> 12814316

A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.

Marjorie K Jeffcoat1, Edwin A McGlumphy, Michael S Reddy, Nico C Geurs, Howard M Proskin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the success of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated and machined titanium (Ti) implants in a 5-year randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at 2 centers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of 120 edentulous patients received HA-coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and machined Ti threaded implants in a randomized design using 5 or 6 implants. Digital radiographs allowed for yearly measurements of bone loss. Calibrated clinicians also measured mobility, Gingival Index, Plaque Index, probing depth, and recession. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the proportion of ailing implants (defined as less than 2 mm of alveolar bone loss over 5 years) for each type of implant design. The criteria employed to assess implant outcome included the need for successful implants to lose less than 2 mm of bone support over the 5 years following placement of the prosthesis.
RESULTS: This analysis revealed that 95.2% of machined Ti threaded implants and 97.92% of HA-coated threaded implants were successful, while 99.0% of HA-coated cylindric implants experienced less than 2 mm of bone loss (P < .06). DISCUSSION: All types of implants placed in this study had success rates above 95%.
CONCLUSION: Over 5 years, the success rate tended to favor HA-coated implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on the long-term success of calcium phosphate plasma-spray-coated dental implants.

Authors:  B A J A van Oirschot; E M Bronkhorst; J J J P van den Beucken; G J Meijer; J A Jansen; R Junker
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Biomaterials approach to expand and direct differentiation of stem cells.

Authors:  Chou Chai; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-24

4.  Histomorphometric evaluation of implants coated with enamel or dentine derived fluoride-substituted apatite.

Authors:  Mehmet Kürkcü; Mehmet Emre Benlidayi; Serhat Ozsoy; Lütfiye Sevgi Ozyeğin; Faik Nuzhet Oktar; Cem Kurtoğlu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Nanotechnology and dental implants.

Authors:  Sandrine Lavenus; Guy Louarn; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2010-12-28

6.  Indigenous hydroxyapatite coated and bioactive glass coated titanium dental implant system - Fabrication and application in humans.

Authors:  Surajit Mistry; Debabrata Kundu; Someswar Datta; Debabrata Basu; Chidambaram Soundrapandian
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2011-07

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Yasmin Ardebili; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-10

8.  Perioprosthetic and Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Complex Cases: Clinical Management and Timing Strategy.

Authors:  Luca Landi; Stefano Piccinelli; Roberto Raia; Fabio Marinotti; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.