Literature DB >> 12814231

In vivo validation of a one-dimensional finite-element method for predicting blood flow in cardiovascular bypass grafts.

Brooke N Steele1, Jing Wan, Joy P Ku, Thomas J R Hughes, Charles A Taylor.   

Abstract

Current practice in vascular surgery utilizes only diagnostic and empirical data to plan treatments and does not enable quantitative a priori prediction of the outcomes of interventions. We have previously described a new approach to vascular surgery planning based on solving the governing equations of blood flow in patient-specific models. A one-dimensional finite-element method was used to simulate blood flow in eight porcine thoraco-thoraco aortic bypass models. The predicted flow rate was compared to in vivo data obtained using cine phase-contrast magnet resonance imaging. The mean absolute difference between computed and measured flow distribution in the stenosed aorta was found to be 4.2% with the maximum difference of 10.6% anda minimum difference of 0.4%. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the flow rate and distribution with respect to stenosis and branch losses were quantified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814231     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.812201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  20 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  A systematic comparison between 1-D and 3-D hemodynamics in compliant arterial models.

Authors:  Nan Xiao; Jordi Alastruey; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 4.  Mechanobiology and the microcirculation: cellular, nuclear and fluid mechanics.

Authors:  Kris Noel Dahl; Agnieszka Kalinowski; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  Validation of computational models in biomechanics.

Authors:  H B Henninger; S P Reese; A E Anderson; J A Weiss
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  On the mechanics underlying the reservoir-excess separation in systemic arteries and their implications for pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2010-12

7.  Characterization of the highly nonlinear and anisotropic vascular tissues from experimental inflation data: a validation study toward the use of clinical data for in-vivo modeling and analysis.

Authors:  Kinon Chen; Bahar Fata; Daniel R Einstein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  A Coupled Lumped-Parameter and Distributed Network Model for Cerebral Pulse-Wave Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Jaiyoung Ryu; Xiao Hu; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Patient-specific surgical planning and hemodynamic computational fluid dynamics optimization through free-form haptic anatomy editing tool (SURGEM).

Authors:  Kerem Pekkan; Brian Whited; Kirk Kanter; Shiva Sharma; Diane de Zelicourt; Kartik Sundareswaran; David Frakes; Jarek Rossignac; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Pulmonary vascular stiffness: measurement, modeling, and implications in normal and hypertensive pulmonary circulations.

Authors:  Kendall S Hunter; Steven R Lammers; Robin Shandas
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.