Literature DB >> 12813220

Consent and refusal in dementia research: conceptual and practical considerations.

J Cohen-Mansfield1.   

Abstract

This article discusses types of consent refusals, rates of refusal, factors that affect consent, and methods to increase rates of consent in elderly research participants and in those with dementia in particular. Refusals can be categorized according to several types: complete refusal, refusal that is time-contingent, partial refusal, and contingent agreement. Rates of consent vary greatly across studies of persons with dementia. This variation can also be affected by different methodologies of calculating rates, in addition to differences in content of studies, populations, and procedures. To warrant consent, a study must first be scientifically sound, with a high likelihood of advancing knowledge, and must provide maximal protection to participants. Consent rates are affected by the following factors: levels of anticipated risks and benefits of the study, relationships among the different caregivers involved in the care of the potential subject, the ability of the researcher to properly identify and locate the person who needs to provide consent, characteristics and attitudes of the person providing consent, and the method of obtaining consent, including timing, location, method of presentation, and type of consent requested. An understanding of these issues can assist the researcher in tailoring research procedures so as to maximize rates of consent. It also raises ethical issues that warrant further discussion concerning the process of obtaining consent from and for persons with dementia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12813220     DOI: 10.1097/00002093-200304001-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  6 in total

1.  Exploring the reasons urban and rural-dwelling older adults participate in memory research.

Authors:  Amanda Hunsaker; C Elizabeth Sarles; Daniel Rosen; Jennifer H Lingler; Marla Bonacile Johnson; Lisa Morrow; Judith Saxton
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.035

2.  Procedural Framework to Facilitate Hospital-Based Informed Consent for Dementia Research.

Authors:  Timothy R Holden; Sarah Keller; Alice Kim; Michael Gehring; Emily Schmitz; Carol Hermann; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Amy J H Kind
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent.

Authors:  Benjamin Hotter; Lena Ulm; Sarah Hoffmann; Mira Katan; Joan Montaner; Alejandro Bustamante; Andreas Meisel
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.474

4.  Experiences of community-dwelling older adults living with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jenny Ploeg; Marta Canesi; Kimberly D Fraser; Carrie McAiney; Sharon Kaasalainen; Maureen Markle-Reid; Sinead Dufour; Lisa Garland Baird; Tracey Chambers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Who is informed and who uninformed? Addressing the legal barriers to progress in dementia research and care.

Authors:  Jiska Cohen-Mansfield
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-02-20

6.  Evidence-Informed Approach to De-Prescribing of Atypical Antipsychotics (AAP) in the Management of Behavioral Expressions (BE) in Advanced Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD): Results of a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Atul Sunny Luthra; Raymond LinBin Gao; Shannon Remers; Peter Carducci; Joanna Sue
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.