BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Coil embolization is safe and effective but may be followed by aneurysm recurrence. Our purpose was to explore the use of alginate as a new embolic agent that could deliver growth factors and improve results of endovascular treatment of aneurysms. METHODS: We first assessed the potential of alginate as a vector for growth factor delivery by using in vitro binding and elution studies. Lateral wall (n = 68) and bifurcation (n = 4) aneurysms were then constructed in six pigs and 36 dogs. We explored iodine-125 transforming growth factor-beta(1) in vivo alginate delivery in 16 canine aneurysms. We next assessed the effects of adding alginate to gelatin sponges on angiographic and pathologic results at 3 weeks (n = 4 each) in an established model used for the study of recanalization and recurrence. We then explored techniques to control endovascular alginate delivery without protection (n = 4), with the protection of a balloon (n = 4), and with the protection of a single coil (n = 12) at the aneurysm neck in 12 porcine aneurysms, four canine lateral wall aneurysms, and four canine bifurcation aneurysms. The stability of cross-linked alginate was studied after intraoperative injections in eight aneurysms. Finally, to determine the value of the material with or without growth factor in promoting aneurysm healing, we compared angiographic results and neointima formation 3 weeks after intraoperative embolization of canine lateral wall aneurysms with alginate blocks with or without platelet-derived growth factor-BB or transforming growth factor-beta(1) (n = 5 each). RESULTS: Growth factors rapidly eluted from alginate in vitro and in vivo. Alginate coating of sponges led to improved angiographic results and thick neointima formation. Intraoperative alginate block embolization did not lead to recurrence, and growth factors delivered with alginate did not show added benefits. Endovascular alginate embolization was complicated by carotid emboli, and the polymer was unstable once injected, causing delayed neurologic deficits. CONCLUSION: Growth factor delivery can be performed with alginate, but formulation changes and improved endovascular control are necessary before contemplating its use in intracranial aneurysms.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Coil embolization is safe and effective but may be followed by aneurysm recurrence. Our purpose was to explore the use of alginate as a new embolic agent that could deliver growth factors and improve results of endovascular treatment of aneurysms. METHODS: We first assessed the potential of alginate as a vector for growth factor delivery by using in vitro binding and elution studies. Lateral wall (n = 68) and bifurcation (n = 4) aneurysms were then constructed in six pigs and 36 dogs. We explored iodine-125 transforming growth factor-beta(1) in vivo alginate delivery in 16 canineaneurysms. We next assessed the effects of adding alginate to gelatin sponges on angiographic and pathologic results at 3 weeks (n = 4 each) in an established model used for the study of recanalization and recurrence. We then explored techniques to control endovascular alginate delivery without protection (n = 4), with the protection of a balloon (n = 4), and with the protection of a single coil (n = 12) at the aneurysm neck in 12 porcine aneurysms, four canine lateral wall aneurysms, and four canine bifurcation aneurysms. The stability of cross-linked alginate was studied after intraoperative injections in eight aneurysms. Finally, to determine the value of the material with or without growth factor in promoting aneurysm healing, we compared angiographic results and neointima formation 3 weeks after intraoperative embolization of canine lateral wall aneurysms with alginate blocks with or without platelet-derived growth factor-BB or transforming growth factor-beta(1) (n = 5 each). RESULTS: Growth factors rapidly eluted from alginate in vitro and in vivo. Alginate coating of sponges led to improved angiographic results and thick neointima formation. Intraoperative alginate block embolization did not lead to recurrence, and growth factors delivered with alginate did not show added benefits. Endovascular alginate embolization was complicated by carotid emboli, and the polymer was unstable once injected, causing delayed neurologic deficits. CONCLUSION: Growth factor delivery can be performed with alginate, but formulation changes and improved endovascular control are necessary before contemplating its use in intracranial aneurysms.
Authors: T Abruzzo; H J Cloft; G G Shengelaia; S M Waldrop; D F Kallmes; J E Dion; I Constantinidis; A Sambanis Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jean Raymond; France Berthelet; Anne-Cécile Desfaits; Igor Salazkin; Daniel Roy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Raymond; P Leblanc; M Chagnon; G Gévry; J P Collet; F Guilbert; A Weill; D Roy Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2004-10-22 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Hans Layman; Maria-Grazia Spiga; Toby Brooks; Si Pham; Keith A Webster; Fotios M Andreopoulos Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2007-02-12 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Jean Raymond; Igor Salazkin; Annick Metcalfe; François Guilbert; Alain Weill; Daniel Roy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.825