Literature DB >> 12811628

Sequential changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density following total hip arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up.

Hiroshi Ohta1, Seneki Kobayashi, Naoto Saito, Masashi Nawata, Hiroshi Horiuchi, Kunio Takaoka.   

Abstract

We sequentially measured the periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, over a 3-year period. The periprosthetic bone was divided into three regions (proximo-medial, middle, and distal to the prosthetic stem). After the insertion of a fully porous coated stem in 21 patients, the BMD was measured within 3 weeks, and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. At 6 months, all zones showed a decrease in BMD relative to the BMD within 3 weeks, but subsequently the BMD was unchanged. The lower the BMD within 3 weeks of surgery, or the lower the body weight, the higher the percent loss of BMD at 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811628     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-002-0414-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  8 in total

1.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Fixation and bone remodeling around a low stiffness stem in revision surgery.

Authors:  Johan Kärrholm; Reza Razaznejad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem.

Authors:  Juan J Panisello; Vicente Canales; Luis Herrero; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; María J Caballero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Periprosthetic bone mineral density with a cementless triple tapered stem is dependent on daily activity.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Takayuki Nishiyama; Takaaki Fujishiro; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Shingo Hashimoto; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Analysis of peripheral bone reconstruction after the failure of hip osteonecrosis treatment with porous tantalum rod implantation.

Authors:  Weilu Liu; Yong Hu; Zhifa Huang; Zhanjun Shi; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Antonio Di Stefano; Andrea Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Randomised trial comparing bone remodelling around two uncemented stems using modified Gruen zones.

Authors:  René H M ten Broeke; Roel P M Hendrickx; Pieter Leffers; Liesbeth M C Jutten; Rudolph G T Geesink
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.