Literature DB >> 12811271

L5-S1 segment survivorship and clinical outcome analysis after L4-L5 isolated fusion.

Gary Ghiselli1, Jeffrey C Wang, Wellington K Hsu, Edgar G Dawson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective investigation of the L5-S1 motion segment after an isolated L4-L5 posterior lumbar fusion.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the survivorship of the L5-S1 segment in patients undergoing L4-L5 fusion and to identify the correlation between radiographic degeneration and clinical outcome at this level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is current controversy regarding future degeneration of the L5-S1 segment following single-segment fusion at L4-L5. There are no long-term studies that look at L5-S1 after L4-L5 fusion to assess the rate of degeneration at this adjacent segment and the functional clinical outcome of the patient.
METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients (average age 56.4 years, range 27-77 years) having isolated L4-L5 posterior spinal fusion for instability or stenosis by a single surgeon were included in this study. There were 25 females and 7 males with an average follow-up of 7.3 years (range 2.3-12.4 years). A survivorship analysis was performed to determine the degeneration at the adjacent L5-S1 segment. Radiographs were analyzed for arthritic degeneration at that level. At the time of the L4-L5 index procedure, the L5-S1 disc spaces were graded on a 4-point scale for degeneration. Questionnaires were submitted by mail, and telephone interviews were conducted by one of the authors to determine the current level of patient function.
RESULTS: Of the total 32 patients assessed, 31 (97%) had no evidence of symptomatic degeneration at L5-S1 requiring additional decompression or fusion. One patient had clinical symptoms that required a foraminotomy and laminotomy at L5-S1, but none of the patients required any further fusion. Although there was a trend of progression of the arthritic grade at L5-S1 from preoperative to postoperative examination, there was no correlation between preoperative arthritic grade versus further degeneration. The discs showed progression of degeneration from an average score of 2.28 before surgery to a score of 2.49 after surgery at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: There appears to be no need to routinely include the L5-S1 segment when performing a posterior lumbar fusion for patients with instability or stenosis at L4-L5 if no symptoms are attributed to the lumbosacral level. At an average of 7.3 years, there was neither increased symptomatic disc degeneration nor symptoms necessitating the need for an L5-S1 fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811271     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065566.24152.D3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  [Effect of lumbar hybrid instrumentation and rigid fusion on the treated and the adjacent segments. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; M Akbar; C H Fürstenberg; C Carstens; S Hemmer; C Schilling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The fate of adjacent segments with pre-existing degeneration after lumbar posterolateral fusion: the influence of degenerative grading.

Authors:  Chao Li; Qing He; Yong Tang; Dike Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Bai-Ling Chen; Fu-Xin Wei; Kazumasa Ueyama; Deng-Hui Xie; Akio Sannohe; Shao-Yu Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Adjacent Segment Pathology after Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Sung-Woo Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

5.  Relation between the sagittal pelvic and lumbar spine geometries following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Frédéric Tanguay; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Jacques A de Guise; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5.

Authors:  Ian J Harding; Sebastian Charosky; Raphael Vialle; Daniel H Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Accelerated L5-S1 Segment Degeneration after Spinal Fusion on and above L4-5 : Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Park; Dong Kyu Chin; Yong Eun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

8.  The Changes in Range of Motion after a Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with Charité in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload : A Comparative Study between Load Control Protocol and Hybrid Protocol.

Authors:  Se-Hoon Kim; Ung-Kyu Chang; Jae-Chil Chang; Kwon-Soo Chun; T Jesse Lim; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-08-31

9.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Spyros Zacharatos; Andreas Zafiropoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Sung-Woo Lee; Young-Joon Ahn; Yung-Tae Kim; Dong-Ho Lee; Mi Young Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.