Literature DB >> 12810772

Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of acute stroke clinical subtypes defined by multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.

S J Allder1, A R Moody, A L Martel, P S Morgan, G S Delay, J R Gladman, G G Lennox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance for acute stroke management, little is known about the underlying pathophysiology when patients with acute stroke are classified using clinical methods.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between the magnetic resonance defined stroke subtype and clinical stroke classifications using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), perfusion weighted imaging (PWI), and angiographic magnetic resonance techniques.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical syndromes consistent with acute anterior circulation stroke were assessed clinically within six hours of onset and scanned as soon as possible using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients were classified clinically into total or partial anterior circulation syndromes using the Oxford classification, or according the severity of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) (severe > 15; mild/moderate <or= 15). At day seven, patients were classified by combining clinical course and MRI data as misdiagnosed, misclassified, suffering transient ischaemic attack, infarct with recanalisation, or infarction with persisting occlusion. Patients with occlusion were further divided on the basis of a large diffusion-perfusion mismatch.
RESULTS: 84 patients with clinical anterior circulation syndromes were studied. Using the NIHSS, 42 were mild to moderate (0-15) and 42 were severe (> 15). There were 42 with partial anterior circulation syndromes (PACS) and 42 with total anterior circulation syndromes (TACS). Patients with TACS or severe stroke were more likely to have actually suffered a stroke (Fischer's exact test, p = 0.01), to have a correctly classified stroke (chi(2) 28.2, p < 0.01), to have persisting occlusion (chi(2) 30.6, p < 0.01), and to have a large DWI-PWI mismatch (chi(2) 17.1, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: There is more inaccuracy in patients presenting with acute PACS or clinically mild to moderate anterior circulation stroke than in those with TACS or severe acute stroke syndromes. The latter appear more likely to be the targets for acute stroke interventions, as they include a significantly higher proportion of patients with persisting occlusion and diffusion/perfusion mismatch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12810772      PMCID: PMC1738523          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  13 in total

1.  Contrast-reduced imaging of tissue concentration and arterial level (CRITICAL) for assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in acute stroke by magnetic resonance.

Authors:  A R Moody; A Martel; A Kenton; S Allder; M A Horsfield; G Delay; P Morgan
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  Predicting outcome in acute stroke.

Authors:  S P Stone; S J Allder; J R Gladman
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Ischemic penumbra: evidence from functional imaging in man.

Authors:  W D Heiss
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  CT and MRI of stroke.

Authors:  M M Bahn; A B Oser; D T Cross
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Limitations of clinical diagnosis in acute stroke.

Authors:  S J Allder; A R Moody; A L Martel; P S Morgan; G S Delay; J R Gladman; P Fentem; G G Lennox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  How well does the Oxfordshire community stroke project classification predict the site and size of the infarct on brain imaging?

Authors:  G E Mead; S C Lewis; J M Wardlaw; M S Dennis; C P Warlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Correlation of angiographic and sequential CT findings in patients with evolving cerebral infarction.

Authors:  L Bozzao; S Bastianello; L M Fantozzi; U Angeloni; C Argentino; C Fieschi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Accuracy of initial stroke subtype diagnosis in the TOAST study. Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.

Authors:  K P Madden; P N Karanjia; H P Adams; W R Clarke
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Heterogeneity of stroke pathophysiology and neuroprotective clinical trial design.

Authors:  Keith W Muir
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  What causes false clinical prediction of small deep infarcts?

Authors:  J Lodder; J Bamford; J Kappelle; J Boiten
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative evaluation of brain development using anatomical MRI and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Kenichi Oishi; Andreia V Faria; Shoko Yoshida; Linda Chang; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  Reprint of "Quantitative evaluation of brain development using anatomical MRI and diffusion tensor imaging".

Authors:  Kenichi Oishi; Andreia V Faria; Shoko Yoshida; Linda Chang; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 3.  Systematic review of CT and MR perfusion imaging for assessment of acute cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  J M Provenzale; K Shah; U Patel; D C McCrory
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Associations of clinical stroke misclassification ('clinical-imaging dissociation') in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Gillian Potter; Fergus Doubal; Caroline Jackson; Cathie Sudlow; Martin Dennis; Joanna Wardlaw
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 5.  Construction and application of human neonatal DTI atlases.

Authors:  Rajiv Deshpande; Linda Chang; Kenichi Oishi
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.856

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.