Literature DB >> 12809536

Laboratory and field testing of particle size-selective sampling methods for mineral dusts.

Marja Teikari1, Markku Linnainmaa, Juha Laitinen, Pentti Kalliokoski, James Vincent, Petri Tiitta, Taisto Raunemaa.   

Abstract

The performances of eight sampling devices were tested with mineral dusts in the laboratory and in a talc production plant. The IOM sampler was chosen as the reference method for inhalable dust, and the IOM samplers provided with the porous plastic foam media were used as the reference methods for both the thoracic and respirable aerosols. The other size-selective instruments tested included the Respicon virtual impactor, the optical GRIMM aerosol monitor, and a two-stage cascade impactor with cut points of 10 and 4 microm. The 37-mm cassettes were also included both as open- and closed-face versions. The study confirmed the usability of the IOM samplers for mineral dust, not only in its original version for the inhalable fraction but also its modified versions for the thoracic and respirable fractions. A high correlation with the two-stage impactor results is an indication of good reproducibility. The results increased the evidence that the 37-mm cassette is a poor indicator of inhalable aerosol. The concentrations obtained with both cassette methods were not only systematically too low but also showed large collection efficiency variability. Therefore, the results cannot be corrected by using correction factors. The concentrations of inhalable aerosol measured with the Respicon were generally low, but its performances for the thoracic and respirable fractions were closer to those for the reference samplers. The results also indicate that the GRIMM monitor is well-suited for such mineral dust determinations when very good accuracy is not required, but the immediate availability of the result is more important.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12809536     DOI: 10.1080/15428110308984822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)        ISSN: 1542-8117


  5 in total

1.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

2.  Exposure assessment and associated lung deposition calculations for vehicular exhaust in four metropolitan cities of Pakistan.

Authors:  Hussain Majid; Khan Alam; Pierre Madl; Werner Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A field evaluation of a single sampler for respirable and inhalable indium and dust measurements at an indium-tin oxide manufacturing facility.

Authors:  Brie Hawley Blackley; Jenna L Gibbs; Kristin J Cummings; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Ji Young Park; Marcia Stanton; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Assessment of two portable real-time particle monitors used in nanomaterial workplace exposure evaluations.

Authors:  Yuewei Liu; Catherine C Beaucham; Terri A Pearce; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Review of Workplace Based Aerosol Sampler Comparison Studies, 2004-2020.

Authors:  James Hanlon; Karen S Galea; Steven Verpaele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.