Literature DB >> 12808539

Locked-in syndrome: improvement in the prognosis after an early intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Emanuela Casanova1, Rosa E Lazzari, Sergio Lotta, Anna Mazzucchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognosis and recovery in patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) receiving early intensive rehabilitative care.
DESIGN: Consecutive sample and follow-up for 5 months to 6 years.
SETTING: Three rehabilitation centers in Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen patients with LIS who underwent the same treatment and subsequently recovered.
INTERVENTIONS: Intensive nursing care and intensive and early rehabilitative program, including physiotherapy and respiratory, swallowing, and speech training. For 4 patients, occupational therapy was performed; 4 subjects also had oculomotor training. After discharge, rehabilitative maintenance care continued for each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motor recovery according to the Patterson and Grabois classification, functional improvement, and mortality rate.
RESULTS: A significant motor recovery was found in 21% of subjects, within 3 to 6 months of onset of the morbid event; complete swallow recovery in 42%; verbal communication in 28%; communication through devices in 42%; effective bladder and bowel control in 35%; and good breathing patterns in 50%. At follow-up, the mortality rate was 14% and only 2 complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive and early rehabilitation, begun within about 1 month of the morbid event, improved the functional recovery and reduced the mortality rate, which, as reported in the literature, had been 60% about 10 years ago. Further studies are necessary to confirm these data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12808539     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00008-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  Unlocking communication with the nose.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Locked-in syndrome.

Authors:  Eimear Smith; Mark Delargy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-19

3.  [Psychotic symptoms in a case of locked-in syndrome].

Authors:  J Mutschler; D Czell; M Kaps; G Manzl
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  [Acute brain stem syndromes].

Authors:  E Evangelidou; R Dengler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Locked-in syndrome: A rare manifestation of pediatric stroke.

Authors:  Monica Juneja; Rahul Jain; Swati Singhal; Devendra Mishra; Sapna Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Locked-in Syndrome in a Nigerian male with Multiple Sclerosis: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Imananagha Kobina Keme-Ebi; Asindi Asindi Asindi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2008-10-30

7.  The prevalence and characteristics of patients with classic locked-in syndrome in Dutch nursing homes.

Authors:  R F Kohnen; J C M Lavrijsen; J H J Bor; R T C M Koopmans
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Brain-computer interface with language model-electroencephalography fusion for locked-in syndrome.

Authors:  Barry S Oken; Umut Orhan; Brian Roark; Deniz Erdogmus; Andrew Fowler; Aimee Mooney; Betts Peters; Meghan Miller; Melanie B Fried-Oken
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Estimated Prevalence of the Target Population for Brain-Computer Interface Neurotechnology in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Elmar G M Pels; Erik J Aarnoutse; Nick F Ramsey; Mariska J Vansteensel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Locked-in, walked out.

Authors:  Seamus Kearney; John McCann; Stanley Hawkins
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2011-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.