Literature DB >> 23526844

Locked-in, walked out.

Seamus Kearney1, John McCann, Stanley Hawkins.   

Abstract

Locked in syndrome is typically associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report a patient who had an unusually good recovery from locked in syndrome due to pontine infarction. The good recovery exhibited by our patient may have resulted from resolution of oedema at the site of infarction and brainstem plasticity being augmented by initial supportive measures in the intensive care unit and early, intensive rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 23526844      PMCID: PMC3605527     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulster Med J        ISSN: 0041-6193


INTRO

The term ‘locked in’ refers to the syndrome of tetraplegia and anarthria with preserved awareness. It was first coined by Plum and Posner in 1966, and is usually due to a lesion of the ventral pons1. It was initially believed to have a grim prognosis, but prolonged survival has been demonstrated in some cases in the last three decades2-4. The condition continues to have significant associated mortality and morbidity, and considerable functional impairment persists in the vast majority of survivors2-4. We report a patient who was ‘locked-in’ due to bilateral pontine infarction, who exhibited an unusually good functional recovery.

CASE REPORT

A 37 year-old previously well female, with a history of migraine with aura, with no other known vascular risk factors experienced a transient episode of diplopia, vertigo and vomiting with subsequent complete recovery. She felt that this was an unusual for her typical aura. The following day she was found unresponsive in her car, with no evidence to suggest a road traffic accident had occurred. Leg twitching was observed by paramedics, and the patient was intubated, ventilated, and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at a district general hospital where a computed tomography (CT) brain scan demonstrated no abnormality. She was subsequently transferred to the regional ICU on the following day, and on sedation withdrawal she was breathing spontaneously, but tetraplegic and anarthric. Full range of eye movements was observed and upper eyelid movements were preserved, which facilitated appropriate ‘yes/no’ responses. A clinical diagnosis of locked-in syndrome was made and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain demonstrated bilateral pontine and right cerebellar infarction (Figure 1). These areas exhibited restricted diffusion, consistent with acute infarction. A magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) of her intra-cranial vessels was normal, indicating presumed spontaneous recanalisation of the basilar artery. Full blood count, inflammatory markers, fasting glucose, renal and liver function tests were all normal. Fasting lipid profile revealed and elevated cholesterol (6.16 mmol/L) and triglycerides (4.63 mmol/L) levels, and a raised cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio. A thrombophilia screen was negative, and no abnormality was detected in an electrocardiograph or transoesophageal echocardiogram.
Fig 1a & b.

T2-weighted axial MRI brain demonstrating bilateral pontine and right cerebellar infarction (August 2008)

T2-weighted axial MRI brain demonstrating bilateral pontine and right cerebellar infarction (August 2008) A method of communication was established using her preserved eye and upper eyelid movements, similar to that described in a previous review of LIS5. Aspirin and atorvastatin were commenced for vascular disease secondary prevention. Two weeks after her initial presentation, she was transferred to a neurology ward at which stage she remained anarthric and tetraplegic. There was early and intensive involvement from physiotherapists (PT), occupational therapists (OT) and speech and language therapists (SALT). A gastrostomy feeding tube was inserted and she also had early and regular review by the neurorehabilitation team. She remained completely quadriplegic for three weeks and completely anarthric for six weeks. At three weeks, a flicker of voluntary left leg movement was observed. Subsequently, she exhibited a slow but surprisingly continual recovery in limb power initially and bulbar function later (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of recovery

Initial assessmentTransfer to RABIU (8 weeks)Discharge from RABIU (18 weeks)
SpeechAnarthricSignificant dysarthreEasily intelligible
SwalloNil by mouthSoft dietSoft-normal diet
TransfersHoistHoistIndependent
WalkingNot applicableRollator, maximum assistance of 2Independent
10m walk timeNot applicable1 min 30 secs10 secs (witk rollator) 42 secs (independently)
Activities of daily living (ADLs)Assistance with all ADLsAssistance with all ADLsIndependent with all ADLs
Summary of recovery Eight weeks after her ictus, she was transferred to the Regional Acquired Brain Injury Unit (RABIU). At that point, she had significant dysarthria and could only safely swallow soft foods. She required a hoist for all transfers and could walk using a rollator with the maximum assistance of two physiotherapists. Her 10 metre walking time was 1 minute and 39 seconds. Functionally she required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). During a ten week in-patient stay at RABIU, with ongoing multi-disciplinary rehabilitation team input, her recovery continued. On discharge from RABIU 18 weeks after her initial presentation, her speech was easily intelligible and she was managing a soft to normal diet safely. She was independent with all ADLs, transfers and could walk independently, but preferred the additional security of a rollator, her 10 metre walking time being 18 seconds. An MRI brain was repeated 9 months after her symptom onset, which demonstrated an extensive gliotic scar incorporating nearly all of the left pons (Figure 2). She has continued to improve since discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and is considering a return to employment.
Fig 2a & b.

T1-weighted sagittal and T2-weighted axial MRI brain demonstrating an extensive left pontine gliotic scar (May 2009)

T1-weighted sagittal and T2-weighted axial MRI brain demonstrating an extensive left pontine gliotic scar (May 2009)

Discussion

Despite the improvements in outcomes from LIS reported in recent decades, the degree of recovery experienced by our patient is notable. A sub-classification of LIS exists in which Plum and Posner's original description, where vertical eye movements are the only preserved motor activity, is termed the classical form6. Incomplete LIS is similar to the classical variety but also has remnants of other voluntary movements in addition to vertical eye movements. Using this sub-classification, our patient initially had incomplete LIS as there was preservation of horizontal eye movements. However, she was undoubtedly at the most extreme limit of the incomplete LIS sub-category. The only classification scale of recovery from LIS is for motor recovery (Figure 3), and has been used in the majority of the literature relating to LIS recovery and outcomes2. In accordance with this scale, our patient exhibited a ‘full recovery’ of motor function. Table 2 summarises the 15 previous cases of LIS that we considered to be comparable to our case, in terms of aetiology (vascular), initial severity and duration of locked-in state and extent of recovery3, 6-14. Very few prognostic indicators pertaining to LIS exist, but non-vascular aetiologies and early preservation of horizontal eye movements have been associated with better outcomes2, 10. Horizontal eye movements are initiated in the brainstem in the paramedian pontine reticular formation beside the sixth nerve nucleus in the pons. Vertical eye movements are initiated higher in the brainstem in the midbrain and diencephalon15. The favourable outcome sometimes associated with preserved horizontal eye movements in LIS is believed to be reflective of a more limited pontine lesion.
Fig 3.

Classification of recovery from LIS

Table 2

Comparable cases

AuthorsYearJournalTotal cases (n)Comparable Recovery (n)
Bauer et al1979J Neurol122
Kurana et al1980Ann Neurol33
McCusker et al1982Arch Neurol41
Ebinger et al1985Int Care Med21
1989Yang et alArch Phys Med Rehab11
Richard et al1995Paraplegia112
2003Casanova et alArch Phys Med Rehab141
Doble et al2003Arch Phys Med Rehab290
New et al2005Arch Phys Med Rehab11
Heyer et al2010Brain Injury92
Leema & Schinider2010Rev Med Suisse11
Total15
Comparable cases Classification of recovery from LIS The impressive recovery observed in our patient may partly be explained by an eventual resolution of oedema surrounding the site of infarction. In addition, the development of a large gliotic scar encompassing the left pons on her repeat MRI scan (Figure 2) in a patient with marked and symmetrical motor recovery is suggestive of a degree of brainstem plasticity. These intrinsic mechanisms of recovery are also likely to be supplemented by the initial supportive care she received in ICU and her subsequent rehabilitation. Improved long-term survival rates and functional outcomes have been observed in patients who had early and intensive rehabilitation2, 4, 14. Furthermore, in the cases comparable to ours, all had access to critical care environments if necessary and initiated intensive rehabilitation early at dedicated rehabilitation units. In summary, this case demonstrates an unusually good functional outcome following LIS from pontine infarction. Similarly good outcomes from LIS have rarely been reported. In concordance with previous reports, there was good recovery after early intensive rehabilitation. Such cases also strengthen the claim that the full range of supportive therapies, including management in critical care units, should be considered in patients presenting with LIS.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Locked-in syndrome.

Authors:  Eimear Smith; Mark Delargy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-19

2.  Varieties of the locked-in syndrome.

Authors:  G Bauer; F Gerstenbrand; E Rumpl
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Persistence of distal motor control in the locked in syndrome. Review of 11 patients.

Authors:  I Richard; Y Péreon; P Guiheneu; B Nogues; B Perrouin-Verbe; J F Mathe
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1995-11

4.  Recovery from the 'locked-in' syndrome.

Authors:  E A McCusker; R A Rudick; G W Honch; R C Griggs
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1982-03

5.  Cognitive impairments in the locked-in syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Peter W New; Sonia J Thomas
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Impairment, activity, participation, life satisfaction, and survival in persons with locked-in syndrome for over a decade: follow-up on a previously reported cohort.

Authors:  Jennifer E Doble; Andrew J Haig; Christopher Anderson; Richard Katz
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.710

7.  Reversible "locked-in" syndromes.

Authors:  G Ebinger; L Huyghens; L Corne; W Aelbrecht
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Locked-in syndrome: a review of 139 cases.

Authors:  J R Patterson; M Grabois
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Early smooth horizontal eye movement: a favorable prognostic sign in patients with locked-in syndrome.

Authors:  C C Yang; J S Lieberman; C Z Hong
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Locked-in syndrome with recovery.

Authors:  R K Khurana; A A Genut; G D Yannakakis
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.