Alfred Jaretzki1. 1. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, Department of Surgery, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. alfred.jaretzki@snet.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Debate continues regarding the effectiveness of thymectomy in the treatment of nonthymomatous autoimmune myasthenia gravis primarily because there have been no controlled prospective studies. The debate is compounded by the lack of recognition that all thymectomies are not equal in extent or effectiveness and by the fact that all the studies are retrospective without common definitions of myasthenia gravis manifestations or response to therapy. In addition, the analysis of data is often inappropriate. REVIEW SUMMARY: Evidence is presented demonstrating that the extent of the various thymic resectional techniques is very variable and often incomplete and that the more complete the thymic resection the better the results. The indications for thymectomy, the selection of the technique of the resection, the reoperations issue, the perioperative management of the myasthenia gravis patient, morbidity and mortality, and appropriate methods of outcome research are also reviewed. CONCLUSION: In view of the impressive results associated with a complete thymic resection in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, patients should not be denied this operation because of lack of prospective proof to-date, and when a thymectomy is performed a total resection is indicated.
BACKGROUND: Debate continues regarding the effectiveness of thymectomy in the treatment of nonthymomatous autoimmune myasthenia gravis primarily because there have been no controlled prospective studies. The debate is compounded by the lack of recognition that all thymectomies are not equal in extent or effectiveness and by the fact that all the studies are retrospective without common definitions of myasthenia gravis manifestations or response to therapy. In addition, the analysis of data is often inappropriate. REVIEW SUMMARY: Evidence is presented demonstrating that the extent of the various thymic resectional techniques is very variable and often incomplete and that the more complete the thymic resection the better the results. The indications for thymectomy, the selection of the technique of the resection, the reoperations issue, the perioperative management of the myasthenia gravispatient, morbidity and mortality, and appropriate methods of outcome research are also reviewed. CONCLUSION: In view of the impressive results associated with a complete thymic resection in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, patients should not be denied this operation because of lack of prospective proof to-date, and when a thymectomy is performed a total resection is indicated.
Authors: H Shiono; A Inoue; N Tomiyama; N Shigemura; K Ideguchi; M Inoue; M Minami; M Okumura Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-05-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Nicholas R Hess; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Arjun Pennathur; Ryan M Levy; Neil A Christie; James D Luketich Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2016-01
Authors: Roberta Ricciardi; Franca Melfi; Michelangelo Maestri; Anna De Rosa; Afroditi Petsa; Marco Lucchi; Alfredo Mussi Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2016-01
Authors: J Bramis; T Diamantis; C Tsigris; E Pikoulis; I Papaconstantinou; A Nikolaou; P Leonardou; E Bastounis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-08-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Nicholas R Hess; Nicholas Baker; Ryan M Levy; Arjun Pennathur; Neil A Christie; James D Luketich; Inderpal S Sarkaria Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.895