Literature DB >> 12808114

Genetic evaluation of localized prostate cancer in a cohort of forty patients: gain of distal 8q discriminates between progressors and nonprogressors.

Herman van Dekken1, Janneke C Alers, Irma A A J Damen, Kees J Vissers, Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg, Robert F Hoedemaeker, Mark F Wildhagen, Wim C J Hop, Theodorus H van der Kwast, Hans J Tanke, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

Over-representation of sequences on chromosome 7 and 8 have been reported to be associated with aggressive behavior of prostate cancer. In this study we have performed a molecular cytogenetic survey by comparative genomic hybridization of a cohort of 40 prostate cancer patients, consisting of 20 progressors and 20 nonprogressors, after radical surgery for localized adenocarcinoma. Progression was defined as a biochemical relapse, ie, an elevation in prostate-specific antigen level in the serum. The mean follow-up after prostatectomy for the progressor group was 10.6 years, for the nonprogressor group, 9.1 years. Using comparative genomic hybridization, we found that progressors harbored on average more aberrations than nonprogressors. Gains were especially more prominent among progressors (p < 0.05), whereas a statistical trend was detected for losses (p = 0.10). As a consequence we examined all chromosome arms separately. The frequencies of loss for areas known to be frequently deleted in prostate cancer, such as 6q, 8p, or 13q, were not different between the two groups. A tendency was observed for more frequent gain on 3q in the progressor group (p = 0.09). However, gain of 8q (minimal overlapping region at 8q24-qter) was significantly more frequent in the progressor group (p = 0.04). This biomarker retained its significance when adjusted for the factors age, tumor grade, tumor stage, resection margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen level. In conclusion we have created a map of genetic changes in progressive and nonprogressive prostatic carcinomas. Importantly, the presence of gain of distal 8q markedly reduced the progression-free survival, suggesting a clinical role for 8q gain in assessing the malignant potential of localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12808114     DOI: 10.1097/01.lab.0000074889.76221.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  7 in total

1.  The impact of genomic alterations on the transcriptome: a prostate cancer cell line case study.

Authors:  J Chaudhary; M Schmidt
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Genetic heterogeneity in Finnish hereditary prostate cancer using ordered subset analysis.

Authors:  Claire L Simpson; Cheryl D Cropp; Tiina Wahlfors; Asha George; Marypat S Jones; Ursula Harper; Damaris Ponciano-Jackson; Teuvo Tammela; Johanna Schleutker; Joan E Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Metastatic properties and genomic amplification of the tyrosine kinase gene ACK1.

Authors:  Edward Htun van der Horst; Yan Y Degenhardt; Astrid Strelow; Anthony Slavin; Lawrence Chinn; Jessica Orf; Minqing Rong; Shyun Li; Lei-Hoon See; Ken Q C Nguyen; Timothy Hoey; Holger Wesche; Scott Powers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Margaret A Leversha; Jialian Han; Zahra Asgari; Daniel C Danila; Oscar Lin; Rita Gonzalez-Espinoza; Aseem Anand; Hans Lilja; Glenn Heller; Martin Fleisher; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Genomic alterations identified by array comparative genomic hybridization as prognostic markers in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Wonshik Han; Mi-Ryung Han; Jason Jongho Kang; Ji-Yeon Bae; Ji Hyun Lee; Young Ju Bae; Jeong Eon Lee; Hyuk-Jae Shin; Ki-Tae Hwang; Sung-Eun Hwang; Sung-Won Kim; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas.

Authors:  Franclim R Ribeiro; Rui Henrique; Merete Hektoen; Marianne Berg; Carmen Jerónimo; Manuel R Teixeira; Ragnhild A Lothe
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Myc-dependent purine biosynthesis affects nucleolar stress and therapy response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stefan J Barfeld; Ladan Fazli; Margareta Persson; Lisette Marjavaara; Alfonso Urbanucci; Kirsi M Kaukoniemi; Paul S Rennie; Yvonne Ceder; Andrei Chabes; Tapio Visakorpi; Ian G Mills
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-05-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.