OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of a personal ultrasound imager (PUI) during consultation rounds for cardiac evaluation of patients with suspected cardiac disease. METHODS: 107 unselected patients from non-cardiac departments (55% men) were enrolled in the study. After the physical examination the consultant cardiologist performed an echocardiographic study with a PUI. The final report was given instantly to the referring physician. All patients subsequently underwent a study with a standard echocardiographic device (SED). For each patient the consultant cardiologist noted whether the findings of the PUI were adequate for final diagnosis. The total cost when full echocardiography was used was compared with the cost when the PUI was used. The time interval from request to diagnosis was also compared. RESULTS: In 84 (78.5%) patients no further examination with an SED was regarded as necessary. Twenty three patients (21.5%) required a further detailed examination with the SED because of the need for haemodynamic information. There was an excellent agreement for the detection of abnormalities between the two devices (96%). The total cost was euro;132 per patient with the SED and euro;75 per patient with the PUI. According to this study, the use of the PUI can lead to a 33.4% reduction of total cost. The mean time from request to diagnosis at the authors' institution was four days for the SED and instantly for the PUI, for additional potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate echocardiographic assessment during consultation rounds can lead to significant cost savings and can shorten the time to diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of a personal ultrasound imager (PUI) during consultation rounds for cardiac evaluation of patients with suspected cardiac disease. METHODS: 107 unselected patients from non-cardiac departments (55% men) were enrolled in the study. After the physical examination the consultant cardiologist performed an echocardiographic study with a PUI. The final report was given instantly to the referring physician. All patients subsequently underwent a study with a standard echocardiographic device (SED). For each patient the consultant cardiologist noted whether the findings of the PUI were adequate for final diagnosis. The total cost when full echocardiography was used was compared with the cost when the PUI was used. The time interval from request to diagnosis was also compared. RESULTS: In 84 (78.5%) patients no further examination with an SED was regarded as necessary. Twenty three patients (21.5%) required a further detailed examination with the SED because of the need for haemodynamic information. There was an excellent agreement for the detection of abnormalities between the two devices (96%). The total cost was euro;132 per patient with the SED and euro;75 per patient with the PUI. According to this study, the use of the PUI can lead to a 33.4% reduction of total cost. The mean time from request to diagnosis at the authors' institution was four days for the SED and instantly for the PUI, for additional potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate echocardiographic assessment during consultation rounds can lead to significant cost savings and can shorten the time to diagnosis.
Authors: W J Stewart; G P Aurigemma; F Z Bierman; J M Gardin; J A Kisslo; A S Pearlman; J B Seward; A E Weyman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Eleni C Vourvouri; Don Poldermans; Johan De Sutter; Fabiola B Sozzi; Paolo Izzo; Jos R T C Roelandt Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: E C Vourvouri; D Poldermans; A F Schinkel; F B Sozzi; J J Bax; H van Urk; J R Roelandt Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: E C Vourvouri; D Poldermans; A F L Schinkel; L Y Koroleva; F B Sozzi; G E Parharidis; J J Bax; J R T C Roelandt Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: P Trambaiolo; F Papetti; A Posteraro; E Amici; M Piccoli; E Cerquetani; G Pastena; G Gambelli; A Salustri Journal: Heart Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Benjamin Acheampong; David A Parra; Muktar H Aliyu; Troy D Moon; Jonathan H Soslow Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Raoul Breitkreutz; Marco Campo Delľ Orto; Christian Hamm; Colleen Cuca; Peter M Zechner; Tanja Stenger; Felix Walcher; Florian H Seeger Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 1.112
Authors: Muhammad Hammadah; Christopher Ponce; Paul Sorajja; João L Cavalcante; Santiago Garcia; Mario Gössl Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 2.882