Literature DB >> 12807841

Clinical utility and cost effectiveness of a personal ultrasound imager for cardiac evaluation during consultation rounds in patients with suspected cardiac disease.

E C Vourvouri1, L Y Koroleva, F J Ten Cate, D Poldermans, A F L Schinkel, R T van Domburg, W B Vletter, J R T C Roelandt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of a personal ultrasound imager (PUI) during consultation rounds for cardiac evaluation of patients with suspected cardiac disease.
METHODS: 107 unselected patients from non-cardiac departments (55% men) were enrolled in the study. After the physical examination the consultant cardiologist performed an echocardiographic study with a PUI. The final report was given instantly to the referring physician. All patients subsequently underwent a study with a standard echocardiographic device (SED). For each patient the consultant cardiologist noted whether the findings of the PUI were adequate for final diagnosis. The total cost when full echocardiography was used was compared with the cost when the PUI was used. The time interval from request to diagnosis was also compared.
RESULTS: In 84 (78.5%) patients no further examination with an SED was regarded as necessary. Twenty three patients (21.5%) required a further detailed examination with the SED because of the need for haemodynamic information. There was an excellent agreement for the detection of abnormalities between the two devices (96%). The total cost was euro;132 per patient with the SED and euro;75 per patient with the PUI. According to this study, the use of the PUI can lead to a 33.4% reduction of total cost. The mean time from request to diagnosis at the authors' institution was four days for the SED and instantly for the PUI, for additional potential cost savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate echocardiographic assessment during consultation rounds can lead to significant cost savings and can shorten the time to diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12807841      PMCID: PMC1767732          DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.7.727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  13 in total

Review 1.  A personal ultrasound imager (ultrasound stethoscope). A revolution in the physical cardiac diagnosis!

Authors:  J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of single-view echocardiographic screening for suspected mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  B J Kimura; R Scott; C L Willis; A N DeMaria
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  The limited echocardiogram: a modification of standard echocardiography for use in the routine evaluation of patients with systemic hypertension.

Authors:  H R Black; G Weltin; C C Jaffe
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Screening cardiac ultrasonographic examination in patients with suspected cardiac disease in the emergency department.

Authors:  B J Kimura; M Bocchicchio; C L Willis; A N Demaria
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Guidelines for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS). Task Force 4: training in echocardiography.

Authors:  W J Stewart; G P Aurigemma; F Z Bierman; J M Gardin; J A Kisslo; A S Pearlman; J B Seward; A E Weyman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Experience with an ultrasound stethoscope.

Authors:  Eleni C Vourvouri; Don Poldermans; Johan De Sutter; Fabiola B Sozzi; Paolo Izzo; Jos R T C Roelandt
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening using a hand-held ultrasound device. "A pilot study".

Authors:  E C Vourvouri; D Poldermans; A F Schinkel; F B Sozzi; J J Bax; H van Urk; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Personal ultrasound imager: abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

Authors:  C J Bruce; P C Spittell; S C Montgomery; K R Bailey; A J Tajik; J B Seward
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency.

Authors:  S Mangione; L Z Nieman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Left ventricular hypertrophy screening using a hand-held ultrasound device.

Authors:  E C Vourvouri; D Poldermans; A F L Schinkel; L Y Koroleva; F B Sozzi; G E Parharidis; J J Bax; J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  9 in total

1.  The "ultrasonic stethoscope": is it of clinical value?

Authors:  A Salustri; P Trambaiolo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device in the outpatient cardiology clinic reduces the need for standard echocardiography.

Authors:  P Trambaiolo; F Papetti; A Posteraro; E Amici; M Piccoli; E Cerquetani; G Pastena; G Gambelli; A Salustri
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Smartphone interfaced handheld echocardiography for focused assessment of ventricular function and structure in children: A pilot study.

Authors:  Benjamin Acheampong; David A Parra; Muktar H Aliyu; Troy D Moon; Jonathan H Soslow
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 1.724

4.  Evaluation of a hand carried cardiac ultrasound device in an outpatient cardiology clinic.

Authors:  E C Vourvouri; D Poldermans; J W Deckers; G E Parharidis; J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Point of care ultrasonography from the emergency department to the internal medicine ward: current trends and perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Leidi; Frédéric Rouyer; Christophe Marti; Jean-Luc Reny; Olivier Grosgurin
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Hand-held echocardiography: added value in clinical cardiological assessment.

Authors:  Giovanna Giannotti; Sergio Mondillo; Maurizio Galderisi; Riccardo Barbati; Valerio Zacà; Piercarlo Ballo; Eustachio Agricola; Francesco Guerrini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials.

Authors:  Raoul Breitkreutz; Marco Campo Delľ Orto; Christian Hamm; Colleen Cuca; Peter M Zechner; Tanja Stenger; Felix Walcher; Florian H Seeger
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.112

Review 8.  Point-of-care ultrasound: Closing guideline gaps in screening for valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Muhammad Hammadah; Christopher Ponce; Paul Sorajja; João L Cavalcante; Santiago Garcia; Mario Gössl
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-size echocardiography performed by medical residents.

Authors:  Ole Christian Mjølstad; Garrett Newton Andersen; Håvard Dalen; Torbjørn Graven; Kyrre Skjetne; Jens Olaf Kleinau; Bjørn Olav Haugen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.875

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.