Literature DB >> 12805697

Why homeodynamics, not homeostasis?

D Lloyd1, M A Aon, S Cortassa.   

Abstract

Ideas of homeostasis derive from the concept of the organism as an open system. These ideas can be traced back to Heraclitus. Hopkins, Bernard, Hill, Cannon, Weiner and von Bertalanffy developed further the mechanistic basis of turnover of biological components, and Schoenheimer and Rittenberg were pioneers of experimental approaches to the problems of measuring pool sizes and dynamic fluxes. From the second half of the twentieth century, a biophysical theory mainly founded on self-organisation and Dynamic Systems Theory allowed us to approach the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the organised complexity that characterises living systems. This combination of theoretical framework and more refined experimental techniques revealed that feedback control of steady states is a mode of operation that, although providing stability, is only one of many modes and may be the exception rather than the rule. The concept of homeodynamics that we introduce here offers a radically new and all-embracing concept that departs from the classical homeostatic idea that emphasises the stability of the internal milieu toward perturbation. Indeed, biological systems are homeodynamic because of their ability to dynamically self-organise at bifurcation points of their behaviour where they lose stability. Consequently, they exhibit diverse behaviour; in addition to monotonic stationary states, living systems display complex behaviour with all its emergent characteristics, i.e., bistable switches, thresholds, waves, gradients, mutual entrainment, and periodic as well as chaotic behaviour, as evidenced in cellular phenomena such as dynamic (supra)molecular organisation and flux coordination. These processes may proceed on different spatial scales, as well as across time scales, from the very rapid processes within and between molecules in membranes to the slow time scales of evolutionary change. It is dynamic organisation under homeodynamic conditions that make possible the organised complexity of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12805697      PMCID: PMC6084724          DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2001.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


  19 in total

Review 1.  What yeast and cardiomyocytes share: ultradian oscillatory redox mechanisms of cellular coherence and survival.

Authors:  David Lloyd; Sonia Cortassa; Brian O'Rourke; Miguel A Aon
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  The fractal architecture of cytoplasmic organization: scaling, kinetics and emergence in metabolic networks.

Authors:  Miguel Antonio Aon; Brian O'Rourke; Sonia Cortassa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  The biology of aging and frailty.

Authors:  Neal S Fedarko
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 4.  Mitochondrial network energetics in the heart.

Authors:  Miguel A Aon; Sonia Cortassa
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2012-08-15

5.  A Framework for Patient State Tracking by Classifying Multiscalar Physiologic Waveform Features.

Authors:  Benjamin Vandendriessche; Mustafa Abas; Thomas E Dick; Kenneth A Loparo; Frank J Jacono
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Mitochondrial oscillations in physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Miguel A Aon; Sonia Cortassa; Brian O'Rourke
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Quantifying periodicity in omics data.

Authors:  Cornelia Amariei; Masaru Tomita; Douglas B Murray
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-08-19

8.  Robust concentration and frequency control in oscillatory homeostats.

Authors:  Kristian Thorsen; Oleg Agafonov; Christina H Selstø; Ingunn W Jolma; Xiao Y Ni; Tormod Drengstig; Peter Ruoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Recurrence quantification of fractal structures.

Authors:  Charles L Webber
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  The intelligence paradox; will ET get the metabolic syndrome? Lessons from and for Earth.

Authors:  Alistair V W Nunn; Geoffrey W Guy; Jimmy D Bell
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.