Literature DB >> 12805504

Cerebral hemodynamics in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Lauri Soinne1, Johanna Helenius, Turgut Tatlisumak, Eija Saimanen, Oili Salonen, Perttu J Lindsberg, Markku Kaste.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis benefit less from carotid endarterectomy (CEA) than symptomatic patients because the risk of embolic events is lower, but it is not known whether the hemodynamic effect of CEA is different between the groups. We evaluated hemodynamics of symptomatic and asymptomatic patient groups before and after CEA.
METHODS: Forty-six independent patients with a unilateral high-grade carotid stenosis, 23 asymptomatic and 23 symptomatic, underwent dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) evaluation before CEA and 3 and 100 days afterward. Quantitative perfusion parameters were calculated separately in selected regions of white and gray matter and watershed regions in each hemisphere, and mean transit time (MTT) maps were assessed visually by 2 independent observers. Vasomotor reactivity was determined with breath-holding index and flow impedance with pulsatility index ipsilaterally.
RESULTS: In contrast to the asymptomatic carotid stenosis group, symptomatic carotid stenosis patients had preoperatively increased MTT and lower cerebral blood flow values in the ipsilateral hemisphere, more in white matter and watershed regions than in gray matter. Visually detected perfusion deficits were associated with symptomatic status. The interhemispheric asymmetries were abolished by CEA. The improving trend over time was greater in the symptomatic carotid stenosis group and was best seen in MTT. On TCD, pulsatility index was lower in symptomatic carotid stenosis patients preoperatively, with no postoperative difference, whereas the breath-holding index improved only in the symptomatic carotid stenosis group after CEA.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis differ significantly by means of DSC-MRI and TCD before and in response to CEA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12805504     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000075605.36068.D9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  26 in total

1.  Short- and long-term hemodynamic and clinical effects of carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  B Yang; W Chen; Y Yang; Y Lin; Y Duan; J Li; H Wang; F Fu; Q Zhuge; X Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Changes in perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid angioplasty with stent.

Authors:  A Tavares; J G Caldas; C C Castro; P Puglia; M E Frudit; L A Barbosa
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Asymmetry of intracranial internal carotid artery on 3D TOF MR angiography: a sign of unilateral extracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Olivier Naggara; Emmanuel Touzé; Nicolas Seiller; Marie-Pierre Gobin-Metteil; Jean-Louis Mas; Jean-François Meder; Catherine Oppenheim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Large-Vessel Vasculopathy in Children With Sickle Cell Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Infarct Topography and Focal Atrophy.

Authors:  Kristin P Guilliams; Melanie E Fields; Dustin K Ragan; Yasheng Chen; Cihat Eldeniz; Monica L Hulbert; Michael M Binkley; James N Rhodes; Joshua S Shimony; Robert C McKinstry; Katie D Vo; Hongyu An; Jin-Moo Lee; Andria L Ford
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  Effect of carotid artery stenting on cerebral blood flow: evaluation of hemodynamic changes using arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Tae Jin Yun; Chul-Ho Sohn; Moon Hee Han; Byung-Woo Yoon; Hyun-Seung Kang; Jeong Eun Kim; Jin Chul Paeng; Seung Hong Choi; Ji-Hoon Kim; Kee-Hyun Chang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cognitive improvement after carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic stenosis.

Authors:  Eric J Heyer; Joanna L Mergeche; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Intracranial vascular feature changes in time of flight MR angiography in patients undergoing carotid revascularization surgery.

Authors:  Zhensen Chen; Li Chen; Manabu Shirakawa; Wenjin Liu; Dakota Ortega; Jinmei Chen; Niranjan Balu; Theodore Trouard; Thomas S Hatsukami; Wei Zhou; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Cardiovagal and adrenergic function tests in unilateral carotid artery stenosis patients-a Valsalva manoeuvre tool to show an autonomic dysfunction?

Authors:  Viktor Švigelj; Matjaž Šinkovec; Viktor Avbelj; Roman Trobec; Ludovit Gaspar; Daniel Petrovič; Peter Kruzliak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Reproducibility of quantitative CT brain perfusion measurements in patients with symptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  A Waaijer; I C van der Schaaf; B K Velthuis; M Quist; M J P van Osch; E P A Vonken; M S van Leeuwen; M Prokop
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  The preoperative neurological evaluation.

Authors:  John Probasco; Bogachan Sahin; Tung Tran; Tae Hwan Chung; Liana Shapiro Rosenthal; Zoltan Mari; Michael Levy
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.