Literature DB >> 12803985

Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures.

Pierluigi Bove1, Dan Stoianovici, Salvatore Micali, Alexandru Patriciu, Nicola Grassi, Thomas W Jarrett, Giuseppe Vespasiani, Louis R Kavoussi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery offers many advantages, but its correct practice is associated with a steep learning curve. Telesurgery allows a surgeon at a remote site to guide and teach surgeons at a primary site by utilizing robotic devices, telecommunications, and video technology, thereby reducing complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1998 to July 2000, 17 procedures were telementored between two sites 9230 km apart: a primary operating room at the Policlinico Casilino "Tor Vergata" University of Rome and a remote site at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in Baltimore. Of these procedures, 14 were laparoscopic cases: 8 spermatic vein ligations, 2 retroperitoneal renal biopsies, 3 simple nephrectomies, and 1 pyeloplasty. Three procedures were carried out to obtain percutaneous renal access. All procedures were performed with the help of two robots: the first robot, AESOP, for the orientation of the laparoscope, and the second one, PAKY, to perform the percutaneous renal access. In addition to the robotic device, the system provided four ISDN lines, a PC with dedicated software to manage the connection, audio and video connections, an external video camera with a panoramic view of the operating room, and remote control of the electrocautery and the Telestrator.
RESULTS: All the procedures were accomplished with an uneventful postoperative course. Ten operative cases were telementored successfully. In five cases, it was not possible to establish a connection to the remote site, and two procedures were converted to open surgery because of intraoperative complications. The time delay of the image transmission was <1 second.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience has demonstrated the feasibility of international telementoring. It could provide education to surgeons and decrease the likelihood of complications attributable to inexperience with new techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12803985     DOI: 10.1089/089277903321618699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

Review 1.  Telementoring and telerobotics in urological surgery.

Authors:  Ben Challacombe; Sarah Wheatstone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Heralding new ringtones of patient safety: Blackberry-based clinical communication and telementoring in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ogochukwu Azuh; Ayan Sen; Rubinfeld Ilan; Neil Shah; Alton Parker; Dionne Blyden; Autumn Broady; Vic Velanovich; Anthony Falvo; Pat Patton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Laparoscopic telementored adrenalectomy: the Italian experience.

Authors:  M Bruschi; S Micali; F Porpiglia; A Celia; S De Stefani; M Grande; R M Scarpa; G Bianchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

5.  Virtual Interactive Presence in Global Surgical Education: International Collaboration Through Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Matthew Christopher Davis; Dang D Can; Jonathan Pindrik; Brandon G Rocque; James M Johnston
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 6.  Recent finding and new technologies in nephrolitiasis: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Marco Rosa; Paolo Usai; Roberto Miano; Fernando J Kim; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Pierluigi Bove; Salvatore Micali
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery.

Authors:  Mehran Anvari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Utilizing da Vinci® surgical system to treat challenging urinary stones.

Authors:  Basmah Al Tinawi; Morris Jessop; Mohamad W Salkini
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

9.  Integration of aquablation through telemetry: an alternative to onsite proctoring?

Authors:  Jose M El-Asmar; Muhieddine Labban; Albert El-Hajj
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Utilising an Accelerated Delphi Process to Develop Guidance and Protocols for Telepresence Applications in Remote Robotic Surgery Training.

Authors:  Justin W Collins; Ahmed Ghazi; Danail Stoyanov; Andrew Hung; Mark Coleman; Tom Cecil; Anders Ericsson; Mehran Anvari; Yulun Wang; Yanick Beaulieu; Nadine Haram; Ashwin Sridhar; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana; Hani J Marcus; Jeffrey Levy; Prokar Dasgupta; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Martin Martino; Richard Feins; Vipul Patel; Mark Slack; Richard M Satava; John D Kelly
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.