Literature DB >> 12802914

In vitro chemosensitivity testing of selected myeloid cells in acute myeloid leukemia.

Lars Möllgård1, Malin Prenkert, Adam Smolowicz, Christer Paul, Ulf Tidefelt.   

Abstract

In several studies different chemosensitivity assays have been examined in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Some have shown that in vitro chemosensitivity testing is an independent prognostic factor but so far no one has been able to show that the use of these methods can improve treatment outcome. In an attempt to improve in vitro chemosensitivity testing in AML we wanted to establish and evaluate a new flow cytometry chemosensitivity assay. After 4 days of incubation viable mononuclear myeloid cells were identified by the exclusion of propidium iodide in CD13 or CD33 positive cells. Sixty-eight samples from 64 AML patients were included. In this study, we showed that the flow cytometry method is feasible in AML and we also found some correlations to clinical data. The secondary AML at diagnosis showed an in vitro resistance to etoposide and amsacrine that was significantly higher compared to de novo AML at diagnosis (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02). When AML patients at diagnosis were compared to resistant disease/relapse patients there was a significantly higher effect of ara-C in the diagnosis group (p = 0.03). Responders and non-responders were compared in vitro but we found no significant differences. In vitro mitoxantrone was more effective in multidrug resistance (MDR) negative cells compared to MDR positive cells (p < 0.01). This new method is feasible and makes it possible to selectively evaluate the effect of cytotoxic drugs in myeloid cells. Further studies with a larger group of patients are needed to evaluate the predictive value of the assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802914     DOI: 10.1080/1042819031000067594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  4 in total

1.  Oncogramme, a new individualized tumor response testing method: application to colon cancer.

Authors:  Elodie Loum; Stephanie Giraud; Barbara Bessette; Serge Battu; Muriel Mathonnet; Christophe Lautrette
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 2.  In vitro assays for the evaluation of drug resistance in tumor cells.

Authors:  Jozef Hatok; Eva Babusikova; Tatiana Matakova; Dusan Mistuna; Dusan Dobrota; Peter Racay
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  A genomics-informed computational biology platform prospectively predicts treatment responses in AML and MDS patients.

Authors:  Leylah M Drusbosky; Neeraj Kumar Singh; Kimberly E Hawkins; Cesia Salan; Madeleine Turcotte; Elizabeth A Wise; Amy Meacham; Vindhya Vijay; Glenda G Anderson; Charlie C Kim; Saumya Radhakrishnan; Yashaswini Ullal; Anay Talawdekar; Huzaifa Sikora; Prashant Nair; Arati Khanna-Gupta; Taher Abbasi; Shireen Vali; Subharup Guha; Nosha Farhadfar; Hemant S Murthy; Biljana N Horn; Helen L Leather; Paul Castillo; Caitlin Tucker; Christina Cline; Leslie Pettiford; Jatinder K Lamba; Jan S Moreb; Randy A Brown; Maxim Norkin; John W Hiemenz; Jack W Hsu; William B Slayton; John R Wingard; Christopher R Cogle
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-06-25

4.  Preferential Activity of Petiveria alliacea Extract on Primary Myeloid Leukemic Blast.

Authors:  Ricardo Ballesteros-Ramírez; Eliana Aldana; María Victoria Herrera; Claudia Urueña; Laura Yinneth Rojas; Luis Fernando Echeverri; Geison Modesti Costa; Sandra Quijano; Susana Fiorentino
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.