Literature DB >> 12802674

Top-down and bottom-up processes in grassland and forested streams.

Per Nyström1, Angus R McIntosh, Michael J Winterbourn.   

Abstract

The influence of predatory fish on the structure of stream food webs may be altered by the presence of forest canopy cover, and consequent differences in allochthonous inputs and primary production. Eight sites containing introduced brown trout ( Salmo trutta) and eight sites that did not were sampled in the Cass region, South Island, New Zealand. For each predator category, half the sites were located in southern beech (Nothofagus) forest patches (range of canopy cover, 65-90%) and the other half were in tussock grassland. Food resources used by two dominant herbivores-detritivores were assessed using stable isotopes. (13)C/(12)C ratios were obtained for coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM), fine particulate organic matter (FPOM), algal dominated biofilm from rocks, and larvae of Deleatidium (Ephemeroptera) and Olinga (Trichoptera). Total abundance and biomass of macroinvertebrates did not differ between streams with and without trout, but were significantly higher at grassland sites than forested sites. However, taxon richness and species composition differed substantially between trout and no-trout sites, irrespective of whether streams were located in forest or not. Trout streams typically contained more taxa, had low biomass of predatory invertebrates and large shredders, but a high proportion of consumers with cases or shells. The standing stock of CPOM was higher at forested sites, but there was less FPOM and more algae at sites with trout, regardless of the presence or absence of forest cover. The stable carbon isotope range for biofilm on rocks was broad and encompassed the narrow CPOM and FPOM ranges. At trout sites, carbon isotope ratios of Deleatidium, the most abundant invertebrate primary consumer, were closely related to biofilm values, but no relationship was found at no-trout sites where algal biomass was much lower. These results support a role for both bottom-up and top-down processes in controlling the structure of the stream communities studied, but indicate that predatory fish and forest cover had largely independent effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802674     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1297-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Allochthonous inputs: integrating population changes and food-web dynamics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Productivity, consumers, and the structure of a river food chain.

Authors:  J T Wootton; M E Power
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Top-down control in a detritus-based food web: fish, shredders, and leaf breakdown.

Authors:  Carl R Ruetz; Raymond M Newman; Bruce Vondracek
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Decoupling of cascading trophic interactions in a freshwater, benthic food chain.

Authors:  Christer Brönmark; Stefan E B Weisner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The impact of vertebrate and invertebrate predators on a stream benthic community.

Authors:  Jonas Dahl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Ecosystem-level evidence for top-down and bottom-up control of production in a grassland stream system.

Authors:  Alexander D Huryn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish-induced changes to grazer behaviour?

Authors:  Angus R McIntosh; Colin R Townsend
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Competitive Outcomes of Aquatic Container Diptera Depend on Predation and Resource Levels.

Authors:  Marcus W Griswold; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes.

Authors:  Erika Nilsson; Karin Olsson; Anders Persson; Per Nyström; Gustav Svensson; Ulf Nilsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Are impacts of an exotic predator on a stream food web influenced by disturbance history?

Authors:  Per Nyström; Angus R McIntosh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Competition, predation and flow rate as mediators of direct and indirect effects in a stream food chain.

Authors:  S Blanchet; G Loot; J J Dodson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Capacity to support predators scales with habitat size.

Authors:  Angus R McIntosh; Peter A McHugh; Michael J Plank; Phillip G Jellyman; Helen J Warburton; Hamish S Greig
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  The potential influence of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and brown trout Salmo trutta on density and breeding of the white-throated dipper Cinclus cinclus.

Authors:  Anna L K Nilsson; Jan Henning L'Abée-Lund; L Asbjørn Vøllestad; Kurt Jerstad; Bjørn Mejdell Larsen; Ole Wiggo Røstad; Svein Jakob Saltveit; Thomas Skaugen; Nils C Stenseth; Bjørn Walseng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.