Literature DB >> 12801894

Excitatory and inhibitory intensity tuning in auditory cortex: evidence for multiple inhibitory mechanisms.

M L Sutter1, W C Loftus.   

Abstract

The intensity tuning of excitatory and suppressive domain frequency response areas was investigated in 230 cat primary auditory cortical and 92 posterior auditory field neurons. Suppressive domains were explored using simultaneous 2-tone stimulation with one tone at the best excitatory frequency. The intensity tuning of excitatory and suppressive domains was negatively correlated, supporting the hypothesis that inhibitory sidebands are related to excitatory domain intensity tuning. To further test this hypothesis, we compared the slopes of the edges of suppressive bands to the intensity tuning of excitatory domains. Edges of suppressive bands next to excitatory domains had slopes significantly more slanted toward the excitatory area in neurons with intensity-tuned excitatory domains. This relationship was not observed for suppressive band edges not next to the excitatory domain (e.g., the lower edge of lower suppressive bands). This indicates that intensity tuning ultimately observed in the excitatory domain results from overlapping excitatory and inhibitory inputs. In combination with results using forward masking, our results suggest that there are separate early and late sources of inhibition contributing to cortical frequency response areas, and only the early-stage inhibition contributes to excitatory domain intensity tuning.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12801894     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00722.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Essential auditory contrast-sharpening is preneuronal.

Authors:  R Stoop; A Kern
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural mechanisms of rhythmic masking release in monkey primary auditory cortex: implications for models of auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Inferring the role of inhibition in auditory processing of complex natural stimuli.

Authors:  Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma; Daniel A Butts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Contribution of inhibition to stimulus selectivity in primary auditory cortex of awake primates.

Authors:  Srivatsun Sadagopan; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Nonmonotonic synaptic excitation and imbalanced inhibition underlying cortical intensity tuning.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Pingyang Li; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  The distributed auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jeffery A Winer; Charles C Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Lateral sharpening of cortical frequency tuning by approximately balanced inhibition.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Robert Arbuckle; Bao-Hua Liu; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Spectrotemporal processing differences between auditory cortical fast-spiking and regular-spiking neurons.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Diverse effects of stimulus history in waking mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth A K Phillips; Christoph E Schreiner; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rapid synaptic depression explains nonlinear modulation of spectro-temporal tuning in primary auditory cortex by natural stimuli.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.