Literature DB >> 12799946

[Coping and convalescence course after lumbar disk operations].

M Grebner1, K Breme, R Rothoerl, C Woertgen, A Hartmann, C Thomé.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of the present prospective longitudinal study was the statistical foundation and thus further replication of recent findings of Hasenbring [13], who postulated a significant importance of specific, within the psychological pain research long neglected pain coping strategies as risk factors concerning pain chronification: appeals to "stick it out" on the cognitive level and endurance strategies on the behavioural level.
METHODS: In contrast to Hasenbring's heterogeneous chronic pain patients sample (first plus repeated surgical or conservative treatment) the present 82 low back pain patients with acute radicular pain and simultaneous lumbar disc prolapse all underwent first time lumbar nucleotomy. Prior to treatment we conducted an extensive psychological and neurological examination. The psychological tests included a general depression scale (Allgemeine Depressionsskala; ADS) and the Kiel Pain Inventory (KPI). Based on these scales a cluster analysis was performed, which allocated patients to four distinct groups resembling the group structure ascertained by Hasenbring [12, 13]: A first group of patients characterized by a positive mood and marked endurance strategies (n=7); another cluster with depressive mood and simultaneous cognitive appeals to stick it out (n=10); a third group of emotionally depressed patients who preferably applied social and physical avoidance strategies in their coping with chronic pain (n=29), plus a last cluster without any psychological risk factors (n=26).
RESULTS: As treatment outcome criteria to evaluate the quality of the convalescence process six months later we assessed the pain intensity (11-point self-rating scale), the ability to work, and whether the patients had applied for early retirement or not. Results showed no significant differences in pain intensity between the groups at the 6-month follow up. Concerning the two other outcome variables the two clusters characterized by cognitive or behavioural endurance tendencies turned out to be high risk groups: At the 6-month follow up patients of both groups seemed less likely to return to work. The patients typified by endurance strategies and positive mood had more often applied for early retirement than those patients without psychological risk factors. DISCUSSION: These results corroborate the finding that this subgroup of chronic low back pain patients might indeed carry a bad prognosis and call for further research into this area, especially with regard to rehabilitation potential and facilities of reintegration into working life.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 12799946     DOI: 10.1007/s004829900011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  9 in total

1.  [Pilot study on pain response patterns in chronic low back pain. The influence of pain response patterns on quality of life, pain intensity and disability].

Authors:  S L Scholich; D Hallner; R H Wittenberg; A C Rusu; M I Hasenbring
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Recall Bias in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Individual Pain Response Patterns Are More Important Than Pain Itself!

Authors:  Zohra Karimi; Alisha Pilenko; Sabine Melanie Held; Monika Ilona Hasenbring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-02

4.  Mild Depression in Low Back Pain: the Interaction of Thought Suppression and Stress Plays a Role, Especially in Female Patients.

Authors:  Kerstin Konietzny; Omar Chehadi; Irmgard Streitlein-Böhme; Herbert Rusche; Roland Willburger; Monika Ilona Hasenbring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  [Chronic low back pain : Replication of different reaction groups].

Authors:  M Holldorf; M Morfeld; M Möller; J Höder; U Koch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  [The cortisol awakening response in patients with acute and chronic low back pain. Relations with psychological risk factors of pain chronicity].

Authors:  S Sudhaus; B Fricke; S Schneider; A Stachon; H Klein; M von Düring; M Hasenbring
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  [Role of cognitive pain coping strategies for depression in chronic back pain. Path analysis of patients in primary care].

Authors:  B W Klasen; J Brüggert; M Hasenbring
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Fear of movement/(Re)injury in low back pain: confirmatory validation of a German version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.

Authors:  Adina Carmen Rusu; Nina Kreddig; Dirk Hallner; Janina Hülsebusch; Monika I Hasenbring
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Endurance and avoidance response patterns in pain patients: Application of action control theory in pain research.

Authors:  Jana Buchmann; Nicola Baumann; Karin Meng; Jana Semrau; Julius Kuhl; Klaus Pfeifer; Miguel Kazén; Heiner Vogel; Hermann Faller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.