| Literature DB >> 12799638 |
N Entz-Werle1, A Schneider, C Kalifa, A-C Voegeli, M-D Tabone, P Marec-Berard, L Marcellin, H Pacquement, P Terrier, P Boutard, N Meyer, M-P Gaub, P Lutz, A Babin, P Oudet.
Abstract
At present, the only recognised prognostic factor for primary osteosarcoma is the histological response to preoperative chemotherapy. Our study was designed to identify new diagnostic markers that could eventually have a prognostic value. A total of 54 patients under 20 years of age with primary osteosarcomas were studied while under treatment by the French Society of Paediatric Oncology OS 94 protocol. Paired normal and biopsy samples were collected. In addition, surgical resection specimens, following preoperative chemotherapy, were obtained in 13 cases. After genomic DNA extraction, an allelotyping analysis targeting microsatellites linked to Rb and p53 genes, and 9p21, 7q31 and 5q21 regions was performed. In all, 94% of the samples at diagnosis showed allelic imbalance and the biopsies were highly rearranged except for the microsatellite targeting 7q31. The same panel was highly informative at surgical resection. Microsatellites investigating Rb, p53 and the 9p21 region were particularly altered without a significant correlation with prognosis. On the other hand, the alteration of the 7q31 locus at diagnosis was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis and a new frequently altered locus, 5q21, was described. In conclusion, this panel allowed us to characterise paediatric osteosarcomas. Correlation of prognosis with the altered 7q31 region could be a useful tool and further studies are required to confirm the importance of 5q21.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12799638 PMCID: PMC2741103 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinical and molecular data of the 54 patients included in our study that are in CCR1 or CCR2, in relapse, in partial remission (PR) or dead
| 1 | 7 | Femur | GR | 76 | h | h | AI | AI | h | h | CCR1 |
| 2 | 14 | Tibia | GR | 81 | h | h | N | AI | N | h | CCR1 |
| 3 | 16 | Tibia | PR | 81 | h | AI | h | h | h | h | CCR1 |
| 4 | 10 | Femur | GR | 77 | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | CCR1 |
| 5 | 13 | Tibia | GR | 82 | AI | AI | AI | h | AI | AI | CCR1 |
| 6 | 12 | Femur | PR | 83 | h | N | AI | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 7 | 15 | Pelvis | PR | 78 | AI | AI | AI | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 8 | 13 | Femur | PR | 86 | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | CCR1 |
| 9 | 12 | Femur | GR | 73 | AI | N | N | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 10 | 13 | Humerus | GR | 85 | AI | AI | AI | N | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 11 | 13 | Tibia | GR | 74 | AI | AI | AI | h | h | h | CCR1 |
| 12 | 11 | Femur | GR | 86 | AI | N | N | N | N | h | CCR1 |
| 13 | 14 | Femur | PR | 86 | N | N | AI | N | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 14 | 13 | Femur | GR | 80 | AI | h | N | AI | h | h | CCR1 |
| 15 | 8 | Femur | GR | 74 | AI | AI | AI | N | N | h | CCR1 |
| 16 | 15 | Tibia | PR | 65 | AI | h | N | AI | N | h | Dead |
| 17 | 15 | Pelvis | GR | 71 | h | h | h | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 18 | Unknown | Unknown | GR | 72 | N | N | N | N | N | N | CCR1 |
| 19 | 8 | Humerus | Unknown | 57 | h | h | AI | N | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 20 | 17 | Femur | PR | 22 | h | h | N | AI | AI | AI | CCR2 |
| 21 | 9 | Femur | GR | 35 | h | h | h | h | AI | AI | CCR2 |
| 22 | 4 | Tibia | GR | 54 | h | N | AI | h | N | h | CCR1 |
| 23 | 17 | Femur | PR | 57 | AI | h | AI | N | N | h | CCR1 |
| 24 | 16 | Humerus | PR | 71 | AI | h | AI | N | AI | h | Dead |
| 25 | 12 | Tibia | PR | 65 | N | h | N | N | N | h | Dead |
| 26 | 9 | Femur | GR | 78 | N | N | h | AI | AI | AI | CCR1 |
| 27 | 12 | Femur | PR | 69 | AI | N | N | h | N | N | CCR1 |
| 28 | 13 | Femur | GR | 39 | AI | N | AI | AI | N | h | CCR1 |
| 29 | 13 | Femur | GR | 19 | AI | AI | AI | h | N | h | Dead |
| 30 | 10 | Femur | PR | 39 | h | h | AI | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 31 | 12 | Femur | GR | 28 | h | N | AI | h | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 32 | 9 | Tibia | GR | 75 | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | CCR1 |
| 33 | 14 | Femur | GR | 32 | AI | h | h | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 34 | 17 | Fibula | GR | 32 | AI | h | h | AI | AI | AI | CCR1 |
| 35 | 20 | Humerus | GR | 52 | h | h | h | h | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 36 | 13 | Fibula | GR | 77 | N | h | h | h | N | N | CCR1 |
| 37 | 15 | Femur | PR | 19 | AI | h | AI | N | AI | h | Dead |
| 38 | 7 | Femur | GR | 54 | AI | h | AI | AI | h | N | CCR1 |
| 39 | 15 | Tibia | PR | 69 | AI | N | h | h | h | h | CCR1 |
| 40 | 10 | Humerus | GR | 77 | AI | AI | h | h | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 41 | 15 | Femur | PR | 11 | h | h | N | AI | h | h | Relapse |
| 42 | 9 | Femur | PR | 7 | h | AI | h | AI | AI | AI | PR |
| 43 | 13 | Tibia | GR | 28 | AI | N | AI | AI | h | N | CCR1 |
| 44 | 9 | Mandibular | PR | 7 | N | N | AI | AI | AI | h | Dead |
| 45 | 7 | Femur | GR | 30 | AI | h | h | h | h | N | CCR1 |
| 46 | 14 | Femur | GR | 30 | h | h | AI | AI | h | h | CCR1 |
| 47 | 13 | Femur | PR | 12 | AI | N | h | N | h | h | CCR1 |
| 48 | 12 | Femur | PR | 54 | h | N | AI | AI | h | h | CCR1 |
| 49 | 14 | Tibia | PR | 32 | AI | N | h | h | AI | AI | CCR1 |
| 50 | 13 | Femur | GR | 38 | h | h | N | AI | N | N | CCR1 |
| 51 | 16 | Femur | PR | 24 | h | N | AI | h | AI | h | CCR1 |
| 52 | 16 | Tibia | PR | 24 | h | AI | h | N | AI | h | PR |
| 53 | 15 | Femur | GR | 3 | AI | N | AI | h | AI | AI | CCR1 |
| 54 | 10 | Femur | PR | 12 | AI | AI | h | AI | AI | h | Dead |
| 29 AI=83% | 11 AI=34% | 27 AI=71% | 23 AI=66% | 26 AI=58% | h | Dead |
The results concerned homozygous (h) or heterozygous patients (with AI or normal status (N)). aMetastatic patients. (GR=good responders (30); PR=poor responders (23).
Figure 1Allelic imbalance (AI). Genomic DNA was extracted from blood, tumour biopsy at diagnosis and tumour of surgical resection (patient 1). PCR of D9S171 was separated by using a sequencing analyser (ALF Pharmacia). The microsatellite was informative and shows a change in the ratio between the two amplified alleles comparing blood and paired tumour biopsies (black arrow). This patient normalised his surgical tumour sample, there is no change in the ratio between the two amplified alleles comparing blood and paired surgical tumour.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier EFS curves for the GR (- - - - -) and PR (——) with a statistical significance (P=0.01).
Figure 3Allelic imbalance (AI) frequencies and percentages of normal (N) status at the five targeted loci in the different subgroups of patients: GR, PR and the population combining different events such as partial remission, relapse and deaths (event).
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier EFS curves of the microsatellite analysis at 7q31 locus for the entire population (A) and for the PR (B) with a statistically significant association between the presence of AI and a worse prognosis (——).
Figure 5Kaplan–Meier EFS curve for the PR with AI at 5q21 region and without alterations. This statistical analysis showed a trend between the presence of AI and a worse survival.
Molecular analysis of the 13 patients whose normal tissue, biopsy at diagnosis and surgical resection samples were analysed
| Patient 1 | GR | Biopsy | h | h | AI | AI | h | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | h | h | N | N | h | h | |||
| Patient 3 | PR | Biopsy | h | AI | h | h | h | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | h | N | h | h | h | h | |||
| Patient 4 | GR | Biopsy | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | |||
| Patient 6 | PR | Biopsy | h | N | AI | AI | AI | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | h | N | N | N | AI | h | |||
| Patient 8 | PR | Biopsy | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | |||
| Metastasis | AI | N | AI | h | N | h | |||
| Patient 10 | GR | Biopsy | AI | AI | AI | N | AI | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | N | AI | N | N | AI | h | |||
| Patient 11 | GR | Biopsy | AI | AI | AI | h | h | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | N | N | N | h | h | h | |||
| Patient 16 | PR | Biopsy | AI | h | N | AI | N | h | Dead |
| Tumour | AI | h | N | AI | AI | h | |||
| Patient 27 | PR | Biopsy | AI | N | N | h | N | N | CCR1 |
| Tumour | AI | N | N | h | N | N | |||
| Patient 29 | GR | Biopsy | AI | AI | AI | AI | N | h | Dead |
| Tumour | AI | AI | AI | AI | AI | h | |||
| Patient 47 | PR | Biopsy | AI | AI | h | N | h | h | CCR1 |
| Tumour | AI | AI | h | AI | h | h | |||
| Patient 49 | PR | Biopsy | AI | N | h | h | AI | AI | CCR1 |
| Tumour | N | N | h | h | N | AI | |||
| Patient 54 | PR | Biopsy | AI | AI | h | AI | AI | h | Dead |
| Tumour | AI | AI | h | AI | AI | h | |||
| Relapse | AI | AI | h | AI | AI | h |
The results were homozygous status (h), AI or normal status (N). This study involved GR and PR that were in first CCR1 or dead.