Literature DB >> 28489748

P16 protein expression as a useful predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma: A systematic meta-analysis under guideline of PRISMA.

Yin Tang1, Changchun Yang, Zonghui Guo, Youwei Fu, Xiao Yu, Binggen Liu, Haier Zhou, Junjie Wang, Weilong Li, Qingjiang Pang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-grade osteosarcoma has highly improved the clinical survival. However, the prognostic and predictive role of P16 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. We first determined whether P16 expression can become a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker in high-grade osteosarcoma.
METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Eligible studies were pooled and the overall odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated in this analysis.
RESULTS: Four studies involving a total of 527 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified. We did not find that P16 expression was correlated with sex status, histologic subtype, and tumor site (P > .1). P16 expression was found to be significantly associated with a "good" response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 4.69, P < .001). A significant relationship was observed between p16 expression and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multivariate analysis (OR = 9.63, P = .001). The expression of the P16 was not associated with clinical outcomes in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by multivariate analysis (OS: P = .448; DFS: P = .263).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of P16 expression could become a promising predictive biomarker of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the white population with high-grade osteosarcoma. However, it was not correlated with the prognosis of patients in OS and DFS. More clinical researches are very essential in Asians in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28489748      PMCID: PMC5428582          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant neoplasm that occurred in primary bone in children and adolescents, arising from the mesenchymal tissues by tumor cells.[ Its incidence is about 2 to 3 per million.[ In the 1950s, chemotherapy was not introduced as part of optional therapies, and a 5-year survival rate is only 10% to 20%.[ However, with the aid of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as advanced surgery, the clinical outcome of osteosarcoma has been significantly improved, with the long-term survival rates from 60% to 80%.[ The treatment of patients with osteosarcoma with local recurrence and clinically evident metastasis still has an unsatisfactory prognosis (a 5-year survival rate of <20%).[ A large number of studies have suggested that the genetic and molecular mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis, progression, and prognosis of osteosarcoma.[ Localized on chromosome 9p21, the human P16 protein, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), encompassing 3 exons and 2 introns, participates in the regulation of cell cycle by preventing cell progression in the G1-to-S phase.[ P16 expression is shown to play an impartment in cancer occurrence, progression, and prognosis.[ Some studies have indicated that the altered expression of P16 was correlated with the pathogenesis and development of human osteosarcoma.[ Some reports demonstrated that the association was found between the expression of P16 and the survival of osteosarcoma patients, but others found no association.[ However, the significance of P16 protein expression has not been evaluated in relation to the clinical outcome and chemotherapy response using multivariate analysis in osteosarcoma. Based on an individual study with sample sizes, we performed this meta-analysis in a large population with high-grade osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to determine whether the immunohistochemical expression of p16 protein had a promising prognostic and predictive role.

Materials and methods

Literature search strategy

We searched a range of online digital databases to identify relevant articles published before October 19th, 2016, including the PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library. The following keywords and search terms used included: (osteosarcoma or osteogenic sarcoma) AND (P16 OR cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A OR CDKN2A OR INK4A) AND expression. We manually scanned the citations of the included studies to achieve other potential publications.

Selection of studies

Articles of the eligibility had to satisfy the following inclusion criteria: the patients were clinically diagnosed with osteosarcoma by histopathological examination; study of tissue specimens available receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was included in the current analysis; the expression of P16 protein were performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC); the studies had sufficient information to determine the association of P16 expression with the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with osteosarcoma; studies provide the hazard ratio (HR) value of P16 expression for overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). To avoid duplicated publications from overlapping samples, only most recent article or the most complete article with more information was selected in our study.

Ethical review

This meta-analysis was not primary research involving human samples, but it was a secondary analysis regarding human subject data published in the public domain.

Data extraction

Data were extracted from eligible studies based on the selection criteria, including first author's last name, year of publication, ethnicity, number of study subjects, age, detection method (IHC), cutoff value (positivity), frequency of the P16 expression, sex status, tumor histology, tumor location, pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and effects on clinical outcomes (OS or DFS).

Statistical analysis

This meta-analysis was carried out using Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to estimate the relationship of P16 expression with the clinicopathological features of cancer, such as sex status, tumor histotypes, tumor location, and pathologic complete response. The pooled HRs with their 95% CIs were also analyzed to determine whether the expression of P16 protein was correlated with OS and DFS in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Heterogeneity among the studies was measured using the χ2 test and Q statistic.[ A P value of <.1 for the Cochrane Q test was considered to be statistically significant heterogeneity. For the results with >2 studies, we performed a sensitivity analysis to estimate the influence of an individual study on the recalculated OR and heterogeneity by omitting one study.[ The random-effects model was applied in the current analysis.[

Results

Characteristics of included studies

As shown in Figure 1, a total of 261 potentially relevant publications were initially retrieved through the above-mentioned databases (PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library) and a manual search. According to the inclusion section, after carefully reading the texts, the current meta-analysis was performed on the final 4 retrospective studies by IHC method, including 527 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma.[ All patients belonged to the white population. The basic characteristics of 4 available studies were listed in Table 1.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of study selection procedure.

Table 1

General characteristics of the eligible studies.

Flow diagram of study selection procedure. General characteristics of the eligible studies.

Correlation between the expression of P16 protein and sex status, tumor histology, and location

We determined whether the expression of P16 protein was associated with the clinicopathological characteristics, such as sex status, tumor histopypes, and tumor site (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Forest plot for the associations of P16 protein expression with clinicopathological features in high-grade osteosarcoma, including sex status, tumor histology, and tumor site.

Forest plot for the associations of P16 protein expression with clinicopathological features in high-grade osteosarcoma, including sex status, tumor histology, and tumor site. The pooled OR from 2 studies involving 219 males and females’ high-grade osteosarcoma, indicating that P16 protein expression was not correlated with sex status (OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 0.66–5.52, P = .236). The overall OR showed that no significant correlation was found between P16 protein expression and histological subtype (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.65–2.38, P = .508), including 3 studies with 313 patients with the osteoblastic type and 162 patients with nonosteoblastic type. The pooled OR from 2 studies demonstrated that P16 protein expression was not correlated with tumor location (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.61–1.46, P = .801), including the femur in 194 cases and the non-femur in 200 cases.

Correlation between the expression of P16 protein and pathologic complete response

When P16-expressing tumors were compared to P16-nonexpressing tumors, a significant correlation was observed between p16 expression and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 4.69, 95% CI = 2.36–9.31, P < .001) (Fig. 3), including 330 P16-expressing tumors and 148 P16-nonexpressing tumors. We further extracted the original results of multivariate logistic regression analysis to examine whether the expression of P16 protein can become a potential predictor of “good” neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. The result showed that P16 expression was significantly correlated with tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 9.63, 95% CI = 2.39–38.85, P = .001), including 4 studies with 527 high-grade osteosarcoma patients (Fig. 4).
Figure 3

Forest plot for the association between P16 protein expression and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in P16-expressing tumors vs. P16-nonexpressing tumors.

Figure 4

Forest plot for the association between P16 protein expression and pathologic complete response using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Forest plot for the association between P16 protein expression and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in P16-expressing tumors vs. P16-nonexpressing tumors. Forest plot for the association between P16 protein expression and pathologic complete response using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Survival analysis of P16 protein expression on high-grade osteosarcoma patients

There were 2 studies estimating the association between P16 expression and OS of 404 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma in multivariate regression analysis (Fig. 5). The pooled HR for OS showed that the expression of P16 protein was not correlated with the prognosis of high-grade osteosarcoma patients in OS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.02–5.74, P = .448). Only one study involving 357 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma reported that no significant relationship was observed between P16 expression and DFS for multivariate analysis (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.86–1.76, P = .263).[
Figure 5

Forest plot for the association between P16 expression and overall survival by multivariate regression analysis.

Forest plot for the association between P16 expression and overall survival by multivariate regression analysis.

Sensitivity analysis

A substantial heterogeneity was found between p16 expression and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multivariate analysis (PY=Y.037Y

Discussion

Patients with osteosarcoma with local relapse and distant metastasis have a relatively high mortality.[ The conventional therapy of high-grade osteosarcoma consists of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.[ The assessment of the histological response to chemotherapy is considered to be a good predictor of survival in osteosarcoma, and a good pathologic response is ≥90% tumor necrosis.[ Some molecular markers such as STAT3 and ERK1 expressions are noted to be correlated with poor response to chemotherapy.[ The p16 tumor suppressor protein has been reported in several types of human cancers, and it is suggested as a potential predictor in the progression and prognosis of cancer.[ The P16 protein was frequently expressed in high-grade osteosarcoma in this study, with a varying frequency of 36.2%[ to 70.6%.[ Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether P16 protein expression using IHC can be used as a predictive biomarker of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognostic marker in 527 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. We analyzed the relationship between the expression of P16 protein and clinicopathological characteristics in high-grade osteosarcoma. The results suggested that significant correlation was not found between P16 expression and sex, tumor histotypes, or location of high-grade osteosarcoma patients (P > .1). A study with 47 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggests that P16 protein expression is related to OS in multivariate regression analysis.[ Righi et al[ reported that the expression of P16 protein using multivariate analysis was not found to be correlated with OS and DFS in 357 high-grade osteosarcoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These 2 studies were pooled, and the present result suggested that P16 protein expression in a larger research of 404 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma was not associated with the prognosis of patients in OS. We also evaluated the association between P16 protein expression and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Our findings indicated that P16 protein expression was correlated with “favorable” neoadjuvant chemotherapy in P16-expressing tumors versus P16-nonexpressing tumors (OR = 4.69, P < .001). Furthermore, the initial results involving 527 whites with high-grade osteosarcoma using multivariate analysis were extracted, the pooled OR was 9.63 (95% CI = 2.39–38.85, P = .001), which suggested that the expression of P16 protein might be used as a promising noninvasive marker to predict the postchemotherapy necrotic response in the white population with high-grade osteosarcoma. Several limitations should be carefully considered in the present study. First, our results included 527 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma, the total sample sizes were <1000,[ which may lack statistically vigorous power. Second, only eligible studies published in English were included in our meta-analysis. Articles published in other languages other than English were excluded because of unreadable contents, and conference abstracts were also excluded based on insufficient information. Third, only white population were included; additional large-scale studies with larger sample size are needed in the future, particularly in the Asian and African populations. In summary, our findings suggested that among high-grade osteosarcoma patients, the use of P16 protein expression as a noninvasive biomarker may be a potential predictor of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinical application. However, it was not associated with the prognosis of patients in OS and DFS in multivariate analysis. Additional clinical researches with larger cases should be essential to further validate the value of P16 expression in Asians and Africans.
  38 in total

1.  Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  p16(MTS-1/CDKN2/INK4a) in cancer progression.

Authors:  J W Rocco; D Sidransky
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate.

Authors:  Paul A Meyers; Cindy L Schwartz; Mark Krailo; Eugenie S Kleinerman; Donna Betcher; Mark L Bernstein; Ernest Conrad; William Ferguson; Mark Gebhardt; Allen M Goorin; Michael B Harris; John Healey; Andrew Huvos; Michael Link; Joseph Montebello; Helen Nadel; Michael Nieder; Judith Sato; Gene Siegal; Michael Weiner; Robert Wells; Lester Wold; Richard Womer; Holcombe Grier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  P16INK4a overexpression and survival in osteosarcoma patients: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Jie Bu; Hui Li; Li-Hong Liu; Yu-Rong Ouyang; Hong-Bin Guo; Xiao-Yang Li; Tao Xiao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  miRNA signatures associate with pathogenesis and progression of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Kevin B Jones; Zaidoun Salah; Sara Del Mare; Marco Galasso; Eugenio Gaudio; Gerard J Nuovo; Francesca Lovat; Kimberly LeBlanc; Jeff Palatini; R Lor Randall; Stefano Volinia; Gary S Stein; Carlo M Croce; Jane B Lian; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Osteosarcoma originates from mesenchymal stem cells in consequence of aneuploidization and genomic loss of Cdkn2.

Authors:  Alexander B Mohseny; Karoly Szuhai; Salvatore Romeo; Emilie P Buddingh; Inge Briaire-de Bruijn; Daniëlle de Jong; Melissa van Pel; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Pancras C W Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 7.  Prognostic value of cell-cycle regulation biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra; Donna E Hansel; Richard J Cote
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Presurgical chemotherapy compared with immediate surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma: Pediatric Oncology Group Study POG-8651.

Authors:  Allen M Goorin; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Meenakshi Devidas; Mark C Gebhardt; Alberto G Ayala; Michael B Harris; Lee J Helman; Holcombe E Grier; Michael P Link
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Retinoblastoma-protein-dependent cell-cycle inhibition by the tumour suppressor p16.

Authors:  J Lukas; D Parry; L Aagaard; D J Mann; J Bartkova; M Strauss; G Peters; J Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

Authors:  Lisa Mirabello; Rebecca J Troisi; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of p16 expression among African American and European American prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Myra Wong; Yaeli Bierman; Curtis Pettaway; Rick Kittles; Martha Mims; Jeffrey Jones; Michael Ittmann
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  The prognostic value of PCNA expression in patients with osteosarcoma: A meta-analysis of 16 studies.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Dong Wang; Na Yuan; Fanxiao Liu; Fu Wang; Bomin Wang; Dongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression in osteosarcoma: A meta-analysis of 16 studies.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Tang Liu; Wanchun Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.