Literature DB >> 12797714

The effect of prandial glucose regulation with repaglinide on treatment satisfaction, wellbeing and health status in patients with pharmacotherapy naïve Type 2 diabetes: a placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

Per Bech1, Robert Moses, Ramón Gomis.   

Abstract

This prospective, 16-week, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study assessed the differential impact of the prandial glucose regulating oral hypoglycaemic drug, repaglinide, and placebo upon perceptions of quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in pharmacotherapy-naive patients with Type 2 diabetes. In addition, the study assessed whether these outcomes were influenced by the patients' level of glycaemic control. A total of 253 patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio of repaglinide: placebo, with doses taken flexibly with main meals (2-4 per day), whenever they were eaten. Repaglinide was initiated at 0.5 mg per meal, increased to 1 mg after 4 weeks if fasting plasma glucose exceeded 7.8 mmol/l. QoL and treatment satisfaction outcomes were compared using generic and disease-specific self-assessment measures, previously applied in diabetes: the WHO Wellbeing Questionnaire (WHO-WBQ), WHO Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (WHO-DTSQ) and EuroQoL EQ-5D. Over the trial period, repaglinide-treated patients reported a significant 9% improvement in (WHO-DTSQ) treatment satisfaction score (p < 0.05). No significant increase was associated with placebo. The correlation between decrease in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and increase in treatment satisfaction (WHO-DTSQ) was -0.22 (p < 0.01). Scores obtained with the other measures did not change significantly during the trial in either group, but the cohort exhibited only a slight reduction in wellbeing (WHO-WBQ) and health status (EQ-5D) at baseline compared with the background population. In conclusion, flexible mealtime dosing with oral medication appears to be well accepted by pharmacotherapy-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes. The results suggest that repaglinide provides a higher level of treatment satisfaction than placebo, and this may in part relate to improved glycaemic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12797714     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023495106160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  43 in total

Review 1.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to the year 2010.

Authors:  A F Amos; D J McCarty; P Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and dose-response relationship of repaglinide in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P Strange; S L Schwartz; R J Graf; W Polvino; I Weston; T C Marbury; W C Huang; R B Goldberg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients is affected by complications but not by intensive policies to improve blood glucose or blood pressure control (UKPDS 37). U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Repaglinide.

Authors:  J A Balfour; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Quality of life in predialysis end-stage renal disease patients at the initiation of dialysis therapy. The NECOSAD Study Group.

Authors:  J C Korevaar; M A Jansen; M P Merkus; F W Dekker; E W Boeschoten; R T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  Review of prandial glucose regulation with repaglinide: a solution to the problem of hypoglycaemia in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  M Nattrass; T Lauritzen
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-09

Review 9.  Barriers to good glycaemic control: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  F J Snoek
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-09

10.  Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study.

Authors:  Y Ohkubo; H Kishikawa; E Araki; T Miyata; S Isami; S Motoyoshi; Y Kojima; N Furuyoshi; M Shichiri
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.602

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effect of prescription drug coverage on health of the elderly.

Authors:  Nasreen Khan; Robert Kaestner; Swu-Jane Lin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The EQ-5D-5L index score is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L index score in diabetes patients.

Authors:  Chen-Wei Pan; Hong-Peng Sun; Xingzhi Wang; Qinghua Ma; Yong Xu; Nan Luo; Pei Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Repaglinide: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Patient-reported assessments in diabetes care: clinical and research applications.

Authors:  Soren E Skovlund
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Satisfaction with treatment among patients with depressive and bipolar disorders.

Authors:  Lars Vedel Kessing; Hanne Vibe Hansen; Mirella Ruggeri; Per Bech
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five Well-Being Scale.

Authors:  Per Bech; Lis Raabaek Olsen; Mette Kjoller; Niels Kristian Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  The well-being and treatment satisfaction of diabetic patients in primary care.

Authors:  Esra Saatci; Gulruh Tahmiscioglu; Nafiz Bozdemir; Ersin Akpinar; Sevgi Ozcan; Hatice Kurdak
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 8.  Quality of life in glaucoma and three other chronic diseases: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Tim Mills; Simon K Law; John Walt; Patricia Buchholz; Jan Hansen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; David P Figgitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Maximizing the value of validation findings to better understand treatment satisfaction issues for diabetes.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Torsten Christensen; Donald Bushnell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.