Literature DB >> 12797392

Prevalence of Brucella antibodies after acute brucellosis.

M Almuneef1, Z A Memish.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of brucellosis is made by a demonstration of high brucella agglutination titer using the Standard Tube Agglutination Test (SAT) in the presence of compatible clinical symptoms. In an endemic area like Saudi Arabia, persistence of brucella antibodies after recovery from acute brucellosis is not uncommon. The aim of this study was to monitor brucella antibody titers after successful treatment and clinical cure, and identify factors influencing their persistence. Patients clinically cured of acute brucellosis, who have at least three serological follow-ups, were reviewed retrospectively. A titer of less than 1:320 was considered a "serological cure". One hundred sixteen (116) patients clinically cured of acute brucellosis were followed up for different lengths of time. All patients had no re-infection or relapse at the end of follow-up. The actuarial life-table analysis showed an increase in proportion of serologically cured from 8.3% in the first three months to 71.4% after two years or more, and the median time for serological cure was 18.5 months (SD = 3 months). In univariate analysis, older age, male gender, and patients treated with less than three antibiotics are more likely to have persistent brucella antibodies of > or = 1:320 (P>0.2). The use of doxycycline in the treatment was associated with serological cure (51.1% vs. 27.5%) (P<0.05). However, with the Cox regression model none of the variables were statistically significant as a prognostic factor for serological cure (P>.05). In conclusion, brucella antibodies of 1:320 or higher can persist for more than 2 years after successful treatment and clinical cure. Re-evaluation of diagnostic titer of brucellosis is required in brucella-endemic countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12797392     DOI: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.2.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of serological diagnostic tests of human brucellosis for prevention and control in Mexico.

Authors:  Carmen Guzmán-Bracho; Berenice Salgado-Jiménez; Liz G Beltrán-Parra; Irma Hernández-Monroy; Fernando Vargas-Pino; Demetrio Rodríguez; Irma López-Martínez; Sergio Pastén-Sánchez; Jesús F González-Roldán; Jorge Membrillo-Hernández; José Alberto Díaz-Quiñónez
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Detection of Brucellae in peripheral blood mononuclear cells for monitoring therapeutic efficacy of brucellosis infection.

Authors:  Heng Yang; Guoxia Zhang; Peifang Luo; Zuoping He; Feihuan Hu; Linhai Li; Jean-Pierre Allain; Chengyao Li; Wenjing Wang
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 3.  Bovine brucellosis - a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sandip Kumar Khurana; Anju Sehrawat; Ruchi Tiwari; Minakshi Prasad; Baldev Gulati; Muhammad Zubair Shabbir; Rajesh Chhabra; Kumaragurubaran Karthik; Shailesh Kumar Patel; Mamta Pathak; Mohd Iqbal Yatoo; Vivek Kumar Gupta; Kuldeep Dhama; Ranjit Sah; Wanpen Chaicumpa
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.320

4.  ELISA Cut-off Point for the Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis; a Comparison with Serum Agglutination Test.

Authors:  Anahita Sanaei Dashti; Abdollah Karimi; Vadood Javad; Farideh Shiva; Fatemeh Fallah; Mohammad Reza Alaei; Goli Angoti; Zahra Pournasiri
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2012-03

5.  A novel multi-epitope recombined protein for diagnosis of human brucellosis.

Authors:  Dehui Yin; Li Li; Xiuling Song; Han Li; Juan Wang; Wen Ju; Xiaofeng Qu; Dandan Song; Yushen Liu; Xiangjun Meng; Hongqian Cao; Weiyi Song; Rizeng Meng; Jinhua Liu; Juan Li; Kun Xu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.