Literature DB >> 12796875

Oral malignancies associated with negative transepithelial brush biopsy.

Tyler J Potter1, Don-John Summerlin, John H Campbell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the incidence of negative brush biopsy for oral lesions later demonstrated histologically to be squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: All diagnoses of oral squamous cell carcinoma from a university oral pathology service for the period June 2000 through March 2002 were reviewed to determine if any had previously undergone brush biopsy reported to be "negative for epithelial abnormality." Those cases identified were further investigated to determine the time lapse between brush biopsy and definitive tissue diagnosis.
RESULTS: Four cases of brush biopsy negative squamous cell carcinoma were identified from 115 total cases of malignancy (3.5%). The average time from brush biopsy to tissue diagnosis was 117.25 days (range, 5 to 292 days).
CONCLUSION: False negative reports are possible with the oral brush biopsy technique. Persistent lesions should undergo tissue biopsy for definitive diagnosis. Copyright 2003 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:674-677, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796875     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  13 in total

1.  Clinical and cytological study of the oral mucosa of smoking and non-smoking qat chewers in Yemen.

Authors:  M Hijazi; H Jentsch; J Al-Sanabani; M Tawfik; T W Remmerbach
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  [Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

Authors:  M Hullmann; T E Reichert; R Dahse; F von Eggeling; H Pistner; H Kosmehl; O Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

3.  Practice tips. Brush biopsy sampling of oral lesions.

Authors:  Christopher Naugler
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Oral premalignancy: new methods of detection and treatment.

Authors:  Ann Gillenwater; Vali Papadimitrakopoulou; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Improving oral cancer survival: the role of dental providers.

Authors:  Diana V Messadi; Petra Wilder-Smith; Lawrence Wolinsky
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2009-11

6.  Efficacy of oral brush cytology in the evaluation of the oral premalignant and malignant lesions.

Authors:  M Babshet; K Nandimath; Sk Pervatikar; Vg Naikmasur
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection of oral cancer.

Authors:  Mark W Lingen; John R Kalmar; Theodore Karrison; Paul M Speight
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Sanjay Mishra; Mamta Singh; Mangal Singh
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-08-24

Review 9.  Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Fedele
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-01-30

10.  The sensitivity and specificity of computerized brush biopsy and scalpel biopsy in diagnosing oral premalignant lesions: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sridhar G Reddy; Surekha Kanala; Anuradha Chigurupati; Shamala Ravi Kumar; Chandhra Sekhar Poosarla; B Venkata Ramana Reddy
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.