Literature DB >> 12796019

Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.

M Martin1, A Villar, A Sole-Calvo, R Gonzalez, B Massuti, J Lizon, C Camps, A Carrato, A Casado, M T Candel, J Albanell, J Aranda, B Munarriz, J Campbell, E Diaz-Rubio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of doxorubicin versus methotrexate in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC versus CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 985 women undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (T1-3 N0-2 M0, stage I-IIIA, UICC) from nine hospitals were stratified with respect to axillary node involvement (node positive versus node negative) and randomized to receive either FAC (500/50/500/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles or CMF (600/60/600/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles.
RESULTS: The relative dose intensities of FAC and CMF were 87% and 85% of planned doses, respectively. Unadjusted data indicated a non-significant trend towards better results with FAC. In the prospectively formed subset of node-negative patients, disease-free survival and overall survival were statistically superior in the FAC treatment arm (P = 0.041 and 0.034, respectively), but this advantage was not seen in the subset of node-positive patients, probably because of a difference in the percentage of patients with four or more positive nodes. Adjusting data for size of treatment effect and potential interactions (number of positive nodes, tumor size, treatment center), the overall relative risk (RR) of disease recurrence and death were significantly lower with FAC treatment (RR 1.2, P = 0.03, and RR 1.3, P = 0.05, respectively). This result was mainly due to the difference observed in the node-negative patient population. Toxicity was mild: FAC induced more alopecia, emesis, mucositis and cardiotoxicity; this last was of clinical concern, but was infrequent and manageable. CMF induced more conjunctivitis and weight gain. There were no toxic deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil is superior to methotrexate in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. A treatment effect is particularly evident in the node-negative patients. Although the clinical toxicity of FAC is greater than that of CMF, the levels were manageable and clinically acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796019     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  45 in total

Review 1.  Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Jonathan Krell; Colin R James; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Vivek Misra; Susan Cleator; David Miles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Increased expression of P-glycoprotein is associated with doxorubicin chemoresistance in the metastatic 4T1 breast cancer model.

Authors:  Lili Bao; Aliyya Haque; Kamilah Jackson; Sidhartha Hazari; Krzysztof Moroz; Rachna Jetly; Srikanta Dash
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Diagnosis and medical treatment of breast cancer. Cordoba Consensus of 2007.

Authors:  Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez; Emilio Alba; Agustí Barnadas; Eloisa Bayo; Antonio Llombart; Ana Lluch; Miguel Martín; José Andrés Moreno-Nogueira; Gumersindo Pérez Manga; Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure; Enrique Aranda
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Second malignancies after breast cancer: The impact of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Chunhui Dong; Ling Chen
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03

Review 7.  Landmark trials in the medical oncology management of early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Whitney Hensing; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Lindsay L Peterson; Jennifer Y Sheng
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Topoisomerase IIalpha expression rather than gene amplification predicts responsiveness of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in women with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Christian Schindlbeck; D Mayr; C Olivier; B Rack; V Engelstaedter; J Jueckstock; C Jenderek; U Andergassen; U Jeschke; K Friese
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a brief history.

Authors:  M Verrill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  PSMB7 is associated with anthracycline resistance and is a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Munkácsy; R Abdul-Ghani; Z Mihály; B Tegze; O Tchernitsa; P Surowiak; R Schäfer; B Györffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.