Literature DB >> 12795800

Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease.

C Scarabelli1, A Gallo, M C Visentin, V Canzonieri, A Carbone, A Zarrelli.   

Abstract

A comparative non-randomized study was carried out to evaluate the role of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (SL) on patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease (NRID) of advanced ovarian cancer (stage IIIC-IV). A total of 142 optimally cytoreduced patients (macroscopic disease absent on peritoneal surface) were divided into two groups: Group A, consisting of 98 patients (53 previously untreated and 45 pretreated at other Institutions), who underwent SL; Group B, consisting of 44 patients (21 previously untreated and 23 pretreated at other Institutions), who did not undergo SL. Each group had statistically equivalent histology, grading, performance status and variety of cytoreductive operations performed. Group A pretreated patients had a greater number of stage III than Group B (P = 0.03). Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy could be carried out with an acceptable morbidity and no mortality. All 142 patients received post-operative chemotherapy including carboplatin. The number of chemotherapy sessions did not differ between the two groups. Comparison of survival revealed that SL significantly improved the survival of previously untreated patients (P = 0.02). The survival was significantly different with nodal status (P = 0.006). Cox's proportional hazard analysis showed that only systematic lymphadenectomy was a significant covariate. The survival was not significantly different in Group A vs Group B pretreated patients; however, it was significantly different with respect to nodal status (P<0.001). Cox's proportional hazard analysis showed that only the initial stage of disease was a significant covariate. The results of the present study shows that aggressive surgical cytoreduction with SL could be therapeutic in previously untreated patients with NRID. Currently, an international prospective randomized study is ongoing to clarify definitively the clinical role of SL.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 12795800     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1997.00418.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence and distribution pattern of nodal metastases in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Bachmann; Robert Bachmann; Bernhard Kraemer; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Anette Staebler; Falko Fend; Ralf Rothmund; Diethelm Wallwiener
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-05

2.  Nodal status--its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C Bachmann; S Bachmann; T Fehm; A Staebler; S Becker; R Rothmund; C Gardanis; E M Grischke; D Wallwiener; E F Solomayer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Bachmann; Sara Y Brucker; Bernhard Kraemer; Ralf Rothmund; Anette Staebler; Falko Fend; Diethelm Wallwiener; Eva-Maria Grischke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  [The role of radical lymphadenectomy. Experiences from the AGO Ovarian Cancer Study Group].

Authors:  P Wimberger; R Kimmig
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Clinical significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Haruko Iwase; Toshio Takada; Chiaki Iitsuka; Hidetaka Nomura; Akiko Abe; Tomoko Taniguchi; Ken Takizawa
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Incidence and Impact of Lymph Node Metastases in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Cornelia Bachmann; Robert Bachmann; Falko Fend; Diethelm Wallwiener
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Role of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery for optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer: Reappraisal in the era of radical surgery.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Eoh; Jung-Yun Lee; Jung Won Yoon; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang-Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

8.  The impact of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy on long-term oncologic outcome of women with advanced ovarian clear-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kajiyama; Shiro Suzuki; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Satoshi Tamauchi; Kiyosumi Shibata; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Chenyan Fang; Yingli Zhang; Lingqin Zhao; Xi Chen; Liang Xia; Ping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Authors:  Yoshiki Ikeda; Masato Yoshihara; Satoshi Tamauchi; Akira Yokoi; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Hiroaki Kajiyama
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.756

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.