Literature DB >> 12792319

Development of a novel eighth-nerve intraneural auditory neuroprosthesis.

Arunkumar N Badi1, Thomas R Kertesz, Richard K Gurgel, Clough Shelton, Richard A Normann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Cochlear nerve stimulation using a linear array of electrodes, the cochlear implant, has become an accepted treatment for profound deafness. Major limitations of this technology are high threshold of stimulation, poor performance in a noisy background, cross-talk between electrodes, unsatisfactory channel selectivity, and variable reconstruction of frequency space. A novel auditory neuroprosthesis is proposed that is expected to overcome these problems by implanting an array of three-dimensional microelectrodes, the Utah Electrode Array, directly into the cochlear nerve. STUDY
DESIGN: We have conducted acute, extending for up to 12 hours and semichronic, extending for up to 52 hours, electrophysiological experiments, radiologic and histologic studies in 12 cats.
METHODS: The electrically evoked auditory brainstem response was used as a means to characterize the threshold, dynamic range, and stability of cochlear nerve stimulation through the implanted Utah Electrode Array neuroprosthesis. Plain film, computed tomographic, and histological studies were conducted to determine the result of the implant.
RESULTS: The electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds were approximately one to two orders of magnitude lower than those evoked with conventional cochlear implants. We were able to close the cochleostomy, bring the cat into normal anatomical position, and obtain stable electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses for up to 52 hours. Plain film and computed tomographic studies indicated that the Utah Electrode Array neuroprosthesis was in the intended position in the nerve. Histological studies did not reveal hemorrhage or significant damage to the nerve.
CONCLUSION: Because the presented stimulation paradigm appears to significantly mitigate some of the problems of conventional cochlear implants, it may offer a new therapeutic approach to profound deafness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12792319     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200305000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Real-Time Localization of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays Using Bipolar Impedance Sensing.

Authors:  Trevor L Bruns; Katherine E Riojas; Robert F Labadie; Robert J Webster Iii
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

3.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.

Authors:  Joseph P Roche; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  A Review of Microelectronic Systems and Circuit Techniques for Electrical Neural Recording Aimed at Closed-Loop Epilepsy Control.

Authors:  Reza Ranjandish; Alexandre Schmid
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.