Literature DB >> 12792011

About time: diagnostic guidelines that help clinicians.

R Foy1, P Warner.   

Abstract

Clinical guidelines often make recommendations on the use of diagnostic tests. Compared with sensitivity and specificity, the use of pre- and post-test probabilities allows a more explicit and rational selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests. Ideally, clinical guidelines relating to diagnosis should routinely incorporate this information to enhance individualised decision making. We report our experience of incorporating pre- and post-test probabilities into a guideline on the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding developed by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Issues relating to their application are highlighted, including the limitations of available evidence on diagnostic tests and prevalence of disease, acceptability to guideline users, and the uncertain impact on actual clinical decision making. Despite these potential difficulties, the incorporation of data on pre- and post-test probabilities into the development and presentation of guideline recommendations may offer an important opportunity to make clinical decision making more transparent for both clinicians and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12792011      PMCID: PMC1743712          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  22 in total

1.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.

Authors:  P G Shekelle; R L Kravitz; J Beart; M Marger; M Wang; M Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Diagnosis and general practice.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.

Authors:  Johann Steurer; Joachim E Fischer; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael Koller; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

6.  The architecture of diagnostic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett; R B Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-02

7.  Evaluation of a clinical test. II: Assessment of validity.

Authors:  P F Chien; K S Khan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Lesson of the week: Playing the odds in clinical decision making: lessons from berry aneurysms undetected by magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  M R Johnson; C D Good; W D Penny; P R Barnes; J W Scadding
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

Review 9.  Ultrasound, hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in the investigation of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  I Symonds
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.237

10.  Use of the progestogen challenge test to reduce the risk of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R D Gambrell; F M Massey; T A Castaneda; A J Ugenas; C A Ricci; J M Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of 2-D versus 3-D ultrasound estimation of the fetal adrenal gland volume and prediction of preterm birth.

Authors:  Ozhan M Turan; Sifa Turan; Irina A Buhimschi; Edmund F Funai; Katherine H Campbell; Ozan M Bahtiyar; Chris R Harman; Joshua A Copel; Ahmet A Baschat; Catalin S Buhimschi
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A proposed evidence-based shoulder special testing examination algorithm: clinical utility based on a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicklaus E Biederwolf
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.