Literature DB >> 12791590

Noninvasive remote ischemic preconditioning for global protection of skeletal muscle against infarction.

Patrick D Addison1, Peter C Neligan, Homa Ashrafpour, Asim Khan, Anguo Zhong, Michael Moses, Christopher R Forrest, Cho Y Pang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and mechanism of action of a noninvasive remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) technique for the protection of multiple distant skeletal muscles against ischemic necrosis (infarction). It was observed in the pig that three cycles of 10-min occlusion and reperfusion in a hindlimb by tourniquet application reduced the infarction of latissimus dorsi (LD), gracilis (GC), and rectus abdominis (RA) muscle flaps by 55%, 60%, and 55%, respectively, compared with their corresponding control (n = 6, P < 0.01) when they were subsequently subjected to 4 h of ischemia and 48 h of reperfusion. This infarct-protective effect of remote IPC in LD muscle flaps was abolished by an intravenous bolus injection of the nonselective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (3 mg/kg) 10 min before remote IPC and a continuous intravenous infusion (3 mg/kg) during remote IPC and by an intravenous bolus injection of the selective delta 1-opioid receptor antagonist 7-benzylidenealtrexone maleate (3 mg/kg). However, this infarct-protective effect of remote IPC was not affected by an intravenous bolus injection of the ganglionic blocker hexamethonium chloride (20 mg/kg) or the nonspecific adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (10 mg/kg) or by a local intra-arterial injection of the adenosine1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (3 mg/muscle flap) given 10 min before remote IPC. It was also observed that this remote IPC of skeletal muscle against infarction was associated with a slower rate of muscle ATP depletion during the 4 h of sustained ischemia and a reduced muscle neutrophilic myeloperoxidase activity after 1.5 h of reperfusion. These observations led us to speculate that noninvasive remote IPC by brief cycles of occlusion and reperfusion in a pig hindlimb is effective in global protection of skeletal muscle against infarction. This infarct-protective effect is most likely triggered by the activation of opioid receptors in the skeletal muscle, and remote IPC is associated with an energy-sparing effect during sustained ischemia and attenuation of neutrophil accumulation during reperfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12791590     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00106.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  39 in total

1.  The evolving story of "conditioning" to protect against acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Effects of ischemic preconditioning on economy, VO2 kinetics and cycling performance in endurance athletes.

Authors:  A E Kilding; G M Sequeira; M R Wood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Opioid receptors and cardioprotection - 'opioidergic conditioning' of the heart.

Authors:  John P Headrick; Louise E See Hoe; Eugene F Du Toit; Jason N Peart
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Modulation of microcirculatory changes in the late phase of hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury by remote ischaemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Niteen Tapuria; Sameer Junnarkar; Mahmoud Abu-Amara; Barry Fuller; Alexander M Seifalian; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Intravenous adenosine protects the myocardium primarily by activation of a neurogenic pathway.

Authors:  Olivier C Manintveld; Maaike te Lintel Hekkert; Elisabeth Keijzer; Pieter D Verdouw; Dirk J Duncker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Protective ischaemia in patients: preconditioning and postconditioning.

Authors:  Asger Granfeldt; David J Lefer; Jakob Vinten-Johansen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Ischemic preconditioning reduces hemodynamic response during metaboreflex activation.

Authors:  Gabriele Mulliri; Gianmarco Sainas; Sara Magnani; Girolamo Palazzolo; Nicola Milia; Andrea Orrù; Silvana Roberto; Elisabetta Marongiu; Raffaele Milia; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Investigation of reperfusion injury and ischemic preconditioning in microsurgery.

Authors:  Wei Zhong Wang
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 9.  The Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Human Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Anthony V Incognito; Jamie F Burr; Philip J Millar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Biological networks in ischemic tolerance - rethinking the approach to clinical conditioning.

Authors:  Josef Anrather; John M Hallenbeck
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.