Literature DB >> 12790347

Reliability and validity of the (modified) Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap.

Astrid G W Meijer1, Hero P Wit, Els M TenVergert, Frans W J Albers, Jeroen E P Muller Kobold.   

Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric adequacy of the (modified) Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap ((m)AIAD). The original version of the AIAD was developed by Kramer et al in 1995. Special emphasis was placed on the statistical aspects of the scores, because these properties place limits on the clinical utility of the instrument. The AIAD is a self-assessment questionnaire that consists of 30 questions covering all the relevant factors of disability in individual hearing functioning in daily life. This paper reports data from 94 subjects, aged 17-65 years, with different hearing abilities, who completed a modified version of the AIAD and the Hearing Disability Questionnaire (HDQ), on two occasions 1 month apart. The psychometric adequacy of the AIAD was determined by measuring its reliability and validity. Factor analysis was performed, and the reliability was tested by measuring internal consistency, split-half correlation, and test-retest reproducibility. The validity was tested by measuring construct and criterion validity. The results showed that the reliability of the (m)AIAD was highly satisfactory, with good internal consistency, high split-half correlations, and high test-retest correlations. Construct validity showed a high correlation between scores on the (m)AIAD and scores on the HDQ. Criterion validity showed a moderate but significant correlation between scores on the (m)AIAD and hearing thresholds in dB HL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12790347     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309101317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  18 in total

Review 1.  [State of the art of quality-of-life measurement in patients with chronic otitis media and conductive hearing loss].

Authors:  S Lailach; I Baumann; T Zahnert; M Neudert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Evaluation of the relation between audiometric and psychometric measures of hearing after tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Astrid G W Korsten-Meijer; Hero P Wit; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Measuring the psychosocial consequences of hearing loss in a working adult population: focus on validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the hearing handicap inventory.

Authors:  D Monzani; E Genovese; S Palma; V Rovatti; M Borgonzoni; A Martini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Mental health and quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Salih Bakir; Vefa Kinis; Yasin Bez; Ramazan Gun; Ediz Yorgancilar; Musa Ozbay; Bülent Aguloglu; Faruk Meric
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Speech Discrimination Difficulties in High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder Are Likely Independent of Auditory Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  William A Dunlop; Peter G Enticott; Ramesh Rajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A Profiling System for the Assessment of Individual Needs for Rehabilitation With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Wouter A Dreschler; I de Ronde-Brons
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Effectiveness of an online SUpport PRogramme (SUPR) for older hearing aid users: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Janine Fj Meijerink; Marieke Pronk; Bernadette Paulissen; Birgit I Witte; Bregje van der Wouden; Vera Jansen; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Patient Report of Hearing in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Recommendations for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Heather L Thompson; Ann Blanton; Barbara Franklin; Vanessa L Merker; Kevin H Franck; D Bradley Welling
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.800

9.  Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation.

Authors:  Peter Molander; Peter Nordqvist; Marie Oberg; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; Gerhard Andersson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Hearing in middle age: a population snapshot of 40- to 69-year olds in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Heather Fortnum; David R Moore; Richard Emsley; Paul Norman; Karen Cruickshanks; Adrian Davis; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Abby McCormack; Mark Lutman; Kevin Munro
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.