Literature DB >> 12790311

Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer.

C Bancej1, K Decker, A Chiarelli, M Harrison, D Turner, J Brisson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As the benefit of clinical breast examination (CBE) over that of screening mammography alone in reducing breast cancer mortality is uncertain, it is informative to monitor its contribution to interim measures of effectiveness of a screening programme. Here, the contribution of CBE to screening mammography in the early detection of breast cancer was evaluated.
SETTING: Four Canadian organised breast cancer screening programmes.
METHODS: Women aged 50-69 receiving dual screening (CBE and mammography) (n = 300,303) between 1996 and 1998 were followed up between screen and diagnosis. Outcomes assessed by mode of detection (CBE alone, mammography alone, or both CBE and mammography) included referral rate, positive predictive value, pathological features of tumours (size, nodal status, morphology), and cancer detection rates overall and for small cancers (< or = 10 mm or node-negative). Heterogeneity in findings across programmes was also assessed.
RESULTS: On first versus subsequent screen, CBE alone resulted in 28.5-36.7% of referrals, and 4.6-5.9% of cancers compared with 52.6-60.1% of referrals and 60.0-64.3% of cancers for mammography alone. Among cancers detected by CBE, 83.6-88.6% were also detected by mammography, whereas for mammographically detected cancers only 31.7-37.2% were also detected by CBE. On average, CBE increased the rate of detection of small invasive cancers by 2-6% over rates if mammography was the sole detection method. Without CBE, programmes would be missing three cancers for every 10,000 screens and 3-10 small invasive cancers in every 100,000 screens.
CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of CBE in an organised programme contributes minimally to early detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12790311     DOI: 10.1258/096914103321610761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  17 in total

1.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Detection and description of small breast masses by residents trained using a standardized clinical breast exam curriculum.

Authors:  Elizabeth Steiner; Donald F Austin; Nancy C Prouser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection?

Authors:  L Provencher; J C Hogue; C Desbiens; B Poirier; E Poirier; D Boudreau; M Joyal; C Diorio; N Duchesne; J Chiquette
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Benefits of screening mammography.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Mechanical imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Armen P Sarvazyan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Tanja Xydeas; Ralph Sinkus; Bernhard Kraemer; Ulrich Vogel; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Thomas Kearney; Stanley B Pollak; Chand Rohatgi; Noune Sarvazyan; Suren Airapetian; Stephanie Browning; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions.

Authors:  A Sarvazyan; V Egorov; J S Son; C S Kaufman
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2008-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.