Literature DB >> 12789133

Ten best readings on community participation and health.

S B Rifkin1.   

Abstract

This article reviews, in the opinion of the author, the 10 most influential reading on community participation and health development. The introduction notes that some of the articles do not address health directly but still do bring crucial interpretations to the topic. All articles view community participation as an intervention by which the lives of people, particularly the poor and marginalised can be improved. In addition, they all address the issue of the value of participation to equity and sustainability. The article considers the readings under four heading: concepts and theory; advocacy; critiques and case studies. It highlights the important contributions each reading makes to the understanding of participation in the wider context of health and health development. In conclusion, the article argues that participation has not met the objectives of planners and professionals, in good part, because it is questionable as to whether viewing participation as an intervention enables them to make correct assessments of its contribution to development. The bottom line is that participation is always about power and control, an issue planners and professionals do not want explicitly to address.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12789133      PMCID: PMC2704450     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  1 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting community participation.

Authors:  J D Zakus; C L Lysack
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.344

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal - an evaluation.

Authors:  Ram B Rana; Rabindra Ghimire; Mahendra B Shah; Tirtha Kumal; Elise Whitley; Ian A Baker
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2012-09-26

2.  Explaining the impact of a women's group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation.

Authors:  Suchitra Rath; Nirmala Nair; Prasanta K Tripathy; Sarah Barnett; Shibanand Rath; Rajendra Mahapatra; Rajkumar Gope; Aparna Bajpai; Rajesh Sinha; Anthony Costello; Audrey Prost
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2010-10-22

3.  On dogs, people, and a rabies epidemic: results from a sociocultural study in Bali, Indonesia.

Authors:  Maria Digna Winda Widyastuti; Kevin Louis Bardosh; C Basri; E Basuno; A Jatikusumah; R A Arief; A A G Putra; A Rukmantara; A T S Estoepangestie; I Willyanto; I K G Natakesuma; I P Sumantra; D Grace; F Unger; J Gilbert
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.520

Review 4.  What can we learn on public accountability from non-health disciplines: a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Sara Van Belle; Susannah H Mayhew
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.