Literature DB >> 12788744

Microbial diversity of biofilms in dental unit water systems.

Ruby Singh1, O Colin Stine, David L Smith, John K Spitznagel, Mohamed E Labib, Henry N Williams.   

Abstract

We investigated the microbial diversity of biofilms found in dental unit water systems (DUWS) by three methods. The first was microscopic examination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), acridine orange staining, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Most bacteria present in the biofilm were viable. FISH detected the beta and gamma, but not the alpha, subclasses of Proteobacteria: In the second method, 55 cultivated biofilm isolates were identified with the Biolog system, fatty acid analysis, and 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing. Only 16S identified all 55 isolates, which represented 13 genera. The most common organisms, as shown by analyses of 16S rDNA, belonged to the genera Afipia (28%) and Sphingomonas (16%). The third method was a culture-independent direct amplification and sequencing of 165 subclones from community biofilm 16S rDNA. This method revealed 40 genera: the most common ones included Leptospira (20%), Sphingomonas (14%), Bacillus (7%), Escherichia (6%), Geobacter (5%), and Pseudomonas (5%). Some of these organisms may be opportunistic pathogens. Our results have demonstrated that a biofilm in a health care setting may harbor a vast diversity of organisms. The results also reflect the limitations of culture-based techniques to detect and identify bacteria. Although this is the greatest diversity reported in DUWS biofilms, other genera may have been missed. Using a technique based on jackknife subsampling, we projected that a 25-fold increase in the number of subclones sequenced would approximately double the number of genera observed, reflecting the richness and high diversity of microbial communities in these biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12788744      PMCID: PMC161485          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3412-3420.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effects of culture conditions and biofilm formation on the iodine susceptibility of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  K L Cargill; B H Pyle; R L Sauer; G A McFeters
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Identification of clinical isolates of gram-negative nonfermentative bacteria by an automated cellular fatty acid identification system.

Authors:  G J Osterhout; V H Shull; J D Dick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Impact of Chlorine and Heat on the Survival of Hartmannella vermiformis and Subsequent Growth of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  J M Kuchta; J S Navratil; M E Shepherd; R M Wadowsky; J N Dowling; S J States; R B Yee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Bacterial succession within a biofilm in water supply lines of dental air-water syringes.

Authors:  B D Tall; H N Williams; K S George; R T Gray; M Walch
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR.

Authors:  M F Polz; C M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of methods to enumerate bacteria in dental unit water lines.

Authors:  R I Karpay; T J Plamondon; S E Mills
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines: prevalence, intensity and microbiological characteristics.

Authors:  J F Williams; A M Johnston; B Johnson; M K Huntington; C D Mackenzie
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Evaluation and use of a low nutrient medium and reduced incubation temperature to study bacterial contamination in the water supply of dental units.

Authors:  H N Williams; H Quinby; E Romberg
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Bacterial contamination of the water supply in newly installed dental units.

Authors:  H N Williams; A Johnson; J I Kelley; M L Baer; T S King; B Mitchell; J F Hasler
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.677

View more
  21 in total

1.  Isolation and identification of bacteria from spent nuclear fuel pools.

Authors:  Eduardo Chicote; Ana M García; Diego A Moreno; M Isabel Sarró; Petra I Lorenzo; Felipe Montero
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Diversity and antibiotic resistance patterns of Sphingomonadaceae isolates from drinking water.

Authors:  Ivone Vaz-Moreira; Olga C Nunes; Célia M Manaia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter sp. clonal selection leads to successive waves of contamination of water in dental care units.

Authors:  Fatima Abdouchakour; Chloé Dupont; Delphine Grau; Fabien Aujoulat; Patricia Mournetas; Hélène Marchandin; Sylvie Parer; Philippe Gibert; Jean Valcarcel; Estelle Jumas-Bilak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Isolate-specific effects of patulin, penicillic Acid and EDTA on biofilm formation and growth of dental unit water line biofilm isolates.

Authors:  Iram Liaqat; Robert Thomas Bachmann; Anjum Nasim Sabri; Robert G J Edyvean
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Novel model for multispecies biofilms that uses rigid gas-permeable lenses.

Authors:  Rebecca Peyyala; Sreenatha S Kirakodu; Jeffrey L Ebersole; Karen F Novak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Analysis of cell wall constituents of biocide-resistant isolates from dental-unit water line biofilms.

Authors:  Iram Liaqat; Anjum Nasim Sabri
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Assessment of inhibitory effects of fluoride-coated tubes on biofilm formation by using the in vitro dental unit waterline biofilm model.

Authors:  Toshiaki Yabune; Satoshi Imazato; Shigeyuki Ebisu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Proteomic analysis of endodontic infections by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  R Nandakumar; N Madayiputhiya; A F Fouad
Journal:  Oral Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009-08

9.  Evaluation of gram negative bacterial contamination in dental unit water supplies in a university clinic in tabriz, iran.

Authors:  Firoz Pouralibaba; Esrafil Balaei; Atabak Kashefimehr
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-09-05

10.  Characterization of biofilm formation by Borrelia burgdorferi in vitro.

Authors:  Eva Sapi; Scott L Bastian; Cedric M Mpoy; Shernea Scott; Amy Rattelle; Namrata Pabbati; Akhila Poruri; Divya Burugu; Priyanka A S Theophilus; Truc V Pham; Akshita Datar; Navroop K Dhaliwal; Alan MacDonald; Michael J Rossi; Saion K Sinha; David F Luecke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.