Literature DB >> 12785074

The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and postchange objects.

Melissa R Beck1, Daniel T Levin.   

Abstract

Theories relating attention to change blindness (CB) imply that representations of objects in the focus of attention are stable and coherent. However, CB occurs for objects in the focus of attention. Here, we explore this apparent contradiction and the possibility that changes can be detected without having a complete and stable representation of the prechange object. The first experiment required observers to recognize a prechange object and a postchange object after viewing arrays of various sizes in which the prechange object was replaced by the postchange object after a brief delay. Results indicated that the representation of the prechange object was strong enough to cue a change but not strong enough to support accurate recognition. The remaining experiments demonstrated that the representation of the prechange object is volatile in that a shift in the display or the presence of a postchange object can disrupt the representation. These findings add to current theories of attention and representations by showing that attention may result in volatile representations that can support change detection without supporting accurate recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12785074     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Change perception using visual transients: object substitution and deletion.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Bruce Bridgeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motion tracking modulates capacity allocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

3.  Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Amanda E van Lamsweerde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

4.  Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions.

Authors:  Maayan Stavans; Yi Lin; Di Wu; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Efficient summary statistical representation when change localization fails.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

6.  Age-related decline of visual processing components in change detection.

Authors:  Matthew C Costello; David J Madden; Stephen R Mitroff; Wythe L Whiting
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-06

7.  Preserved visual representations despite change blindness in infants.

Authors:  Su-hua Wang; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

8.  Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object.

Authors:  Cheng-Ta Yang; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-01-30

9.  Detailed sensory memory, sloppy working memory.

Authors:  Ilja G Sligte; Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke; H Steven Scholte; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-21

10.  Implicit processing during change blindness revealed with mouse-contingent and gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Andrey Chetverikov; Maria Kuvaldina; W Joseph MacInnes; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.