Literature DB >> 12784296

Interaction of genetic counselors with molecular genetic testing laboratories: implications for non-geneticist health care providers.

Margaret M McGovern1, Marta Benach, Randi Zinberg.   

Abstract

The availability of molecular genetic tests for the identification of mutant gene carriers, and for assessing individual genetic response to pharmacologic agents, infectious agents, and other environmental exposures, is expected to result in the increased use of the molecular genetic testing laboratory by primary care physicians. However, a number of concerns have been raised about such testing including the need for safeguards to protect patient privacy, and if the interface between genetic testing laboratories and the ordering physician facilitates the appropriate clinical use of the test result. In this study, genetic counselors were surveyed to determine their practices with regard to the clinical issues of informed consent and confidentiality in the context of genetic testing, and to assess their level of satisfaction with the reporting practices of molecular genetic testing laboratories. The results of this survey revealed that there is variability in the practices of genetic counselors with regard to obtaining informed consent, and that there are areas for improvement with regard to molecular genetic test reports, particularly in terms of interpretation of results. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12784296     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  6 in total

1.  Defining the role of laboratory genetic counselor.

Authors:  Susan Christian; Margaret Lilley; Stacey Hume; Patrick Scott; Martin Somerville
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Margaret M McGovern; Zoe Gibson; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Victoria M Pratt; Jamila Rashid; Colleen Shaw; Lander Stoddard; Tracy L Trotter; Marc S Williams; Jean Amos Wilson; Kenneth Pass
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability.

Authors:  Talya Miron-Shatz; Sivan R Rapaport; Naama Srebnik; Yaniv Hanoch; Jonina Rabinowitz; Glen M Doniger; Linda Levi; Jonathan J Rolison; Avi Tsafrir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Next Generation sequencing is the impetus for the next generation of laboratory-based genetic counselors.

Authors:  Amy Swanson; Erica Ramos; Holly Snyder
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Ordering molecular genetic tests and reporting results: practices in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Michele Caggana; Carolyn Constantin; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Tracy L Trotter; Jean Amos Wilson; Margaret M McGovern
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.