Douglas B Villaret1, Neal A Futran. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room M2-228, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA. villadb@ent.ufl.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Whether secondary to cancer surgery ablation or trauma, surgeons are faced with defects of the mandible or maxilla that would be best reconstructed with a thin, pliable soft tissue component and vascularized bone. A subset of these challenging wounds do not require the bicortical bone necessary to reestablish structural integrity or to retain a dental prosthesis, because the soft tissue needs are more critical than the bony needs. It is this niche that the radial forearm osteofaciocutaneous free flap (RFOFF) fulfills well. In the past, potential and real donor site morbidity has precluded the routine use of this flap. New methods to reduce this morbidity have rekindled our use of this flap. PROCEDURES USED: A retrospective review of patients with defects of the mandible or maxilla treated with the RFOFF from July 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was performed. After flap harvest, the donor site was rigidly fixated. A skin graft was placed, and a volar splint was applied for 7 days. The arm was then fully mobilized. Parameters examined were defect location, donor site complications, flap survival, fistula occurrence, plate fracture, and/or extrusion. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were reconstructed with the RFOFF with a follow-up of 10-54 months. Seven patients had an anterior maxillectomy defect, and 27 patients had a lateral mandibulectomy defect with associated tongue/tonsillar fossa and/or palate defect. There were no cases of flap failure or donor site radius fracture. During the follow-up period, there were no plate fractures or intraoral exposures as evidenced by clinical and radiographic evaluation. Fistulas occurred in five patients; all healed without surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: With rigid fixation of the residual radius, donor site morbidity has been minimized, and indications for this flap have expanded. Specifically the anterior maxillary arch and the ascending ramus, angle, and posterior body of the mandible (nontooth-bearing areas) are the sites most amenable to the thin bony stock of the harvested radius. The pliable forearm skin is ideal for the soft tissue defects. We believe that the RFOFF with bone has a definite role in the reconstruction of select head and neck defects. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
INTRODUCTION: Whether secondary to cancer surgery ablation or trauma, surgeons are faced with defects of the mandible or maxilla that would be best reconstructed with a thin, pliable soft tissue component and vascularized bone. A subset of these challenging wounds do not require the bicortical bone necessary to reestablish structural integrity or to retain a dental prosthesis, because the soft tissue needs are more critical than the bony needs. It is this niche that the radial forearm osteofaciocutaneous free flap (RFOFF) fulfills well. In the past, potential and real donor site morbidity has precluded the routine use of this flap. New methods to reduce this morbidity have rekindled our use of this flap. PROCEDURES USED: A retrospective review of patients with defects of the mandible or maxilla treated with the RFOFF from July 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was performed. After flap harvest, the donor site was rigidly fixated. A skin graft was placed, and a volar splint was applied for 7 days. The arm was then fully mobilized. Parameters examined were defect location, donor site complications, flap survival, fistula occurrence, plate fracture, and/or extrusion. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were reconstructed with the RFOFF with a follow-up of 10-54 months. Seven patients had an anterior maxillectomy defect, and 27 patients had a lateral mandibulectomy defect with associated tongue/tonsillar fossa and/or palate defect. There were no cases of flap failure or donor site radius fracture. During the follow-up period, there were no plate fractures or intraoral exposures as evidenced by clinical and radiographic evaluation. Fistulas occurred in five patients; all healed without surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: With rigid fixation of the residual radius, donor site morbidity has been minimized, and indications for this flap have expanded. Specifically the anterior maxillary arch and the ascending ramus, angle, and posterior body of the mandible (nontooth-bearing areas) are the sites most amenable to the thin bony stock of the harvested radius. The pliable forearm skin is ideal for the soft tissue defects. We believe that the RFOFF with bone has a definite role in the reconstruction of select head and neck defects. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Nichole R Dean; Mark K Wax; Frank W Virgin; J Scott Magnuson; William R Carroll; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Mitchell L Worley; Travis M Patterson; Evan M Graboyes; Yongren Wu; Robert M Brody; Joshua Hornig; Zeke Walton Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Remco de Bree; Alessandra Rinaldo; Eric M Genden; Carlos Suárez; Juan Pablo Rodrigo; Johannes J Fagan; Luiz P Kowalski; Alfio Ferlito; C René Leemans Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Denys J Loeffelbein; Sammy Al-Benna; Lars Steinsträßer; Robin M Satanovskij; Nils H Rohleder; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco R Kesting Journal: Eplasty Date: 2012-02-03