Literature DB >> 12784010

A biomechanical analysis of polyethylene liner cementation into a fixed metal acetabular shell.

Geoffrey F Haft1, Anneliese D Heiner, Lawrence D Dorr, Thomas D Brown, John J Callaghan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A common clinical scenario encountered by an orthopaedic surgeon is a patient with a secure cementless acetabular shell and a failed polyethylene liner. One treatment option is to cement a new liner into the fixed shell. The purpose of this study was to evaluate technical variables to improve the mechanical strength of such cemented liner constructs.
METHODS: The contributions of shell texturing, liner texturing, and cement mantle thickness (between the liner and the shell) were evaluated by comparing torsional strength (among nine groups of constructs) and lever-out strength (among eight groups of constructs).
RESULTS: Failure almost always occurred at the cement-liner interface. The two exceptions (failure at the shell-cement interface) occurred with a polished, untextured shell with no screw-holes. This finding indicates that if a shell has existing texturing (such as holes), further intraoperative scoring of the shell is unnecessary, but some sort of texturing is necessary to avoid construct failure at the shell-cement interface. Textured liners had significantly (a = 0.05) greater torsional and lever-out strength than untextured liners. The greatest construct strength occurred when liner grooves were oriented so as to oppose the applied loading. A 4-mm-thick cement mantle resulted in slightly greater torsional strength than a 2-mm-thick cement mantle, and a 2-mm-thick cement mantle resulted in considerably greater lever-out strength than a 4-mm-thick cement mantle, but these differences were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: When cementing a liner into a well-fixed shell, a surgeon should ensure that both the shell and the liner are textured, as interdigitation of the cement with the shell and the liner is crucial to the mechanical strength of this construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12784010     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Partial exchange in total hip arthroplasty : What can we combine?]

Authors:  P Weber; A Steinbrück; A C Paulus; M Woiczinski; F Schmidutz; A Fottner; V Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Cementing acetabular liners into secure cementless shells for polyethylene wear provides durable mid-term fixation.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; David W Hennessy; Steve S Liu; Kirsten E Goetz; Anneliese D Heiner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are abductor muscle quality and previous revision surgery predictors of constrained liner failure in hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Loi'y H Mustafa; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; Jacob M Elkins; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

5.  Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects.

Authors:  Thomas J Blumenfeld; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The Effects of Cyclic Loading and Motion on the Implant-Cement Interface and Cement Mantle of PEEK and Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Raelene M Cowie; Louise M Jennings; Adam Briscoe; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.