Literature DB >> 12783954

Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation.

Marcia W Raggio1, Christoph E Schreiner.   

Abstract

Patterns of threshold distributions for single-cycle sinusoidal electrical stimulation and single pulse electrical stimulation were compared in primary auditory cortex of the adult cat. Furthermore, the effects of auditory deprivation on these distributions were evaluated and compared across three groups of adult cats. Threshold distributions for single and multiple unit responses from the middle cortical layers were obtained on the ectosylvian gyrus in an acutely implanted animal; 2 wk after deafening and implantation (short-term group); and neonatally deafened animals implanted following 2-5 yr of deafness (long-term group). For all three cases, we observed similar patterns of circumscribed regions of low response thresholds in the region of primary auditory cortex (AI). A dorsal and a ventral region of low response thresholds were found separated by a narrow, anterior-posterior strip of elevated thresholds. The ventral low-threshold regions in the short-term group were cochleotopically arranged. By contrast, the dorsal region in the short-term animals and both low-threshold regions in long-term deafened animals maintained only weak cochleotopicity. Analysis of the spatial extent of the low-threshold regions revealed that the activated area for sinusoidal stimulation was smaller and more circumscribed than for pulsatile stimulation for both dorsal and ventral AI. The width of the high-threshold ridge that separated the dorsal and ventral low-threshold regions was greater for sinusoidal stimulation. Sinusoidal and pulsatile threshold behavior differed significantly for electrode configurations with low and high minimum thresholds. Differences in threshold behavior and cortical response distributions between the sinusoidal and pulsatile stimulation suggest that stimulus shape plays a significant role in the activation of cortical activity. Differences in the activation pattern for short-term and long-term deafness reflect deafness-induced reorganizational changes based on factors such as differences in excitatory and inhibitory balance that are affected by the stimulation parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783954     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00341.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Hearing loss raises excitability in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Vibhakar C Kotak; Sho Fujisawa; Fanyee Anja Lee; Omkar Karthikeyan; Chiye Aoki; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity.

Authors:  Christoph E Schreiner; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mohamed Bingabr; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Primary auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the thalamus.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Jonathan Y Shih; Christoph E Schreiner; Steven W Cheung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Sung-Il Nam; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Cochlear implants and brain plasticity.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  A map of periodicity orthogonal to frequency representation in the cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gerald Langner; Hubert R Dinse; Ben Godde
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.