Literature DB >> 12783171

Distribution of prostate carcinoma foci within the peripheral zone: analysis of 8,062 prostate biopsy cores.

C Brossner1, A Winterholer, M Roehlich, E Dlouhy-Schütz, V Serra, M Sonnleithner, K H Grubmüller, K Pummer, E Schuster.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of prostate cancer within the peripheral zone by prostate biopsies excluding the influence of the transition zone. A prospective, multicenter study was carried out using a consecutive series of men who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies using different biopsy techniques at six institutions. Biopsies were directed strictly within the peripheral zone or strictly within the transition zone. A model of the peripheral zone with 18 sectors of similar volume was established and the biopsy cores obtained were associated with these sectors and analysed with respect to prostate cancer detection rate. A total of 904 men (mean age 66.8 years, range 42-86) with a median serum PSA of 8.1 ng/ml (2.2-940 ng/ml) entered the study. A total of 8,062 biopsy cores (mean 8.92/patient) were obtained. Each of the peripheral zone sectors tested by biopsies yielded a similar percentage of prostate cancer ( P=0.6). There was no increase in the incidence of cancer toward the lateral sectors compared to midline sectors ( P=0.53) of the peripheral zone. Biopsy sampling of the peripheral zone from the apex to the base yielded a similar percentage of prostate cancer ( P=0.47). Our data suggest that the distribution of cancer foci detected by biopsies in the peripheral zone of the prostate is homogeneous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783171     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0341-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional computer-simulated prostate models: lateral prostate biopsies increase the detection rate of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J J Bauer; J Zeng; J Weir; W Zhang; I A Sesterhenn; R R Connelly; S K Mun; J W Moul
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation.

Authors:  M E Chen; P Troncoso; K Tang; R J Babaian; D Johnston
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Prostate cancer detection with two sets of ten-core compared with two sets of sextant biopsies.

Authors:  K G Fink; G Hutarew; W Lumper; A Jungwirth; O Dietze; N T Schmeller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume.

Authors:  J E McNeal; O Haillot
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Comparative study of two different TRUS-guided sextant biopsy techniques in detecting prostate cancer in one biopsy session.

Authors:  C Brössner; S Madersbacher; G Bayer; A Pycha; H C Klingler; U Maier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: biopsy strategy implications.

Authors:  M E Chen; D A Johnston; K Tang; R J Babaian; P Troncoso
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Twelve prostate biopsies detect significant cancer volumes (> 0.5 mL).

Authors:  C Brössner; G Bayer; S Madersbacher; W Kuber; C Klingler; A Pycha
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer.

Authors:  M Norberg; L Egevad; L Holmberg; P Sparén; B J Norlén; C Busch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies.

Authors:  F Daneshgari; G D Taylor; G J Miller; E D Crawford
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Biopsy standards for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bob Djavan; Markus Margreiter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Application of vibro-acoustography in prostate tissue imaging.

Authors:  Azra Alizad; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Farid G Mitri; Brian J Davis; Thomas J Sebo; Lance A Mynderse; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The differential effects of prostate stromal cells derived from different zones on prostate cancer epithelial cells under the action of sex hormones.

Authors:  Qi Jiang; Bang-Min Han; Fu-Jun Zhao; Yan Hong; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Transperineal prostate biopsy: analysis of a uniform core sampling pattern that yields data on tumor volume limits in negative biopsies.

Authors:  Gordon R Kepner; Jeremy V Kepner
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 5.  A biomedical engineering approach to mitigate the errors of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Gordon Kepner; Jeremy Kepner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  CMDX©-based single source information system for simplified quality management and clinical research in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Okyaz Eminaga; Mahmoud Abbas; Reemt Hinkelammert; Ulf Titze; Olaf Bettendorf; Elke Eltze; Enver Ozgür; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.