Literature DB >> 12781727

Overlapping neural regions for processing rapid temporal cues in speech and nonspeech signals.

Marc F Joanisse1, Joseph S Gati.   

Abstract

Speech perception involves recovering the phonetic form of speech from a dynamic auditory signal containing both time-varying and steady-state cues. We examined the roles of inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in processing these aspects of auditory speech and nonspeech signals. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to record activation in superior temporal gyrus (STG) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) while participants discriminated pairs of either speech syllables or nonspeech tones. Speech stimuli differed in either the consonant or the vowel portion of the syllable, whereas the nonspeech signals consisted of sinewave tones differing along either a dynamic or a spectral dimension. Analyses failed to identify regions of activation that clearly contrasted the speech and nonspeech conditions. However, we did identify regions in the posterior portion of left and right STG and left IFG yielding greater activation for both speech and nonspeech conditions that involved rapid temporal discrimination, compared to speech and nonspeech conditions involving spectral discrimination. The results suggest that, when semantic and lexical factors are adequately ruled out, there is significant overlap in the brain regions involved in processing the rapid temporal characteristics of both speech and nonspeech signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12781727     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00046-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Dissociable effects of phonetic competition and category typicality in a phonetic categorization task: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Martina Huss; Ferath Kherif; Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin; Olaf Hauk; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Speech perception, rapid temporal processing, and the left hemisphere: a case study of unilateral pure word deafness.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Randi C Martin; A Cris Hamilton; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Developmental changes in activation and effective connectivity in phonological processing.

Authors:  Tali Bitan; Jimmy Cheon; Dong Lu; Douglas D Burman; Darren R Gitelman; M-Marsel Mesulam; James R Booth
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  An event-related fMRI investigation of voice-onset time discrimination.

Authors:  Emmette R Hutchison; Sheila E Blumstein; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Contribution of the anterior insula to temporal auditory processing deficits in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Claudia Steinbrink; Hermann Ackermann; Thomas Lachmann; Axel Riecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language.

Authors:  Begoña Díaz; Cristina Baus; Carles Escera; Albert Costa; Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.