Literature DB >> 12781276

Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: relationship of vaulting to cataract formation.

Michel Gonvers1, Chantal Bornet, Philippe Othenin-Girard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study cataract formation in eyes with an implantable contact lens (ICL) used for moderate to high myopia.
SETTING: University Eye Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
METHODS: An ICL (model V3 or V4, Staar Surgical AG) was implanted in 75 eyes. Three months after surgery and again at the last follow-up examination, the transparency of the crystalline lens was assessed on transilluminated photographs and the vaulting of the ICL over the crystalline lens was evaluated. Central vaulting was measured precisely on digitized photographs taken with a 75 SL Zeiss slitlamp camera, while peripheral vaulting was estimated on photographs obtained with a Scheimpflug camera. The minimum follow-up was 12 months; the mean was 21.8 months.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up, 20 of the 75 eyes (27%) had an ICL-induced anterior subcapsular cataract (ASCC). The number of cataracts increased with the duration of the follow-up. Cataracts developed more commonly in older patients than in younger patients. All 20 cataracts occurred when the central vaulting was equal to or less than 0.09 mm. In 26 eyes with the same range of vaulting (among which 11 had no vaulting), the lenses were clear at the last visit. The 20 patients with cataract and the 26 patients with clear lenses matched in age and duration of follow-up but not in myopia. No touch between the ICL and the crystalline lens was encountered when the central vaulting was equal to or greater than 0.15 mm. Vaulting showed a slight decrease over time. No statistically significant difference in vaulting was found between models V3 and V4.
CONCLUSION: Central and/or peripheral contact between the ICL and the crystalline lens may be responsible for the high incidence of ASCC formation in this study. Central vaulting greater than 0.09 mm appears to protect the crystalline lens from cataract formation. However, we recommend aiming for higher central vaulting (0.15 mm) to avoid contact between the ICL and the crystalline lens. This should be attainable by implanting longer ICLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12781276     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00065-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  52 in total

1.  Changes in the crystalline lens resulting from insertion of a phakic IOL (ICL) into the porcine eye.

Authors:  Kunitoshi Fujisawa; Kimiya Shimizu; Shigekazu Uga; Masanobu Suzuki; Koichi Nagano; Yuuki Murakami; Hiroko Goseki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Phakic intraocular lenses. Current status and limitations].

Authors:  H B Dick; M Tehrani
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Long-term evaluation of the central vault after phakic Collamer® lens (ICL) implantation using OCT.

Authors:  Jose F Alfonso; L Fernández-Vega; C Lisa; P Fernandes; J González-Meijome; R Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Three-year follow-up of subjective vault following myopic implantable collamer lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Carlos Lisa; A Abdelhamid; Paulo Fernandes; Jorge Jorge; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  An interesting case of implantable contact lens.

Authors:  V K Mohindra; Savio Pereira
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-06-21

Review 6.  [Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part II. Phakic posterior chamber lenses and refractive lens exchange with posterior chamber lens implantation].

Authors:  T Kohnen; T Kasper; E Terzi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 7.  [Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part 1: phakic anterior chamber lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Baumeister; M Cichocki
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  [Can the implantable collamer lens with AquaPORT technology safely prevent an angle block? Early experiences in the Homburg/Saar refractive surgery center].

Authors:  T Tsintarakis; T Eppig; A Langenbucher; B Seitz; M El-Husseiny
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 9.  [Scheimpflug photography for the examination of phakic intraocular lenses].

Authors:  M Baumeister
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia.

Authors:  Ahmed M Emarah; Mostafa A El-Helw; Hazem M Yassin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.