Literature DB >> 12780889

Anorectal function following low anterior resection.

O O Rasmussen1, I K Petersen, J Christiansen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rectal function following rectal resection for carcinoma was studied in 43 patients.
METHODS: Sixteen women and 27 men with a median age of 66 years (range 41-79 years) were included. Twenty-three patients had a diverting ileostomy at the time of resection. Eight patients had a 6-cm colonic J-pouch. Ten patients had anastomotic leakage including two patients without diverting ileostomy. One patient had pre-operative radiation with 25 Gy. The patients were studied at a median 12 months (range 3-30) after rectal resection. Distance from anal verge to the anastomosis was a median 7 cm (range 3-12 cm). Clinical data, anal manometry and rectal compliance were analysed.
RESULTS: Stool frequency was 3 per day (range 1-10). Twenty-two (51%) patients were continent, 11 (26%) were incontinent for flatus, and 10 (23%) were incontinent for faeces (three for liquid and seven for solid stool). Fourteen (33%) patients had constipation, two of whom also had incontinence for solid or liquid stool. The level of the anastomosis for patients with postoperative constipation was 5 cm (range 3-12 cm), while it was 7 cm (range 3-10 cm) for nonconstipated patients (NS). Anal manometry was normal. Rectal compliance was lower in patients with incontinence for liquid or solid faeces than in patients with flatus incontinence only (P < 0.01), and rectal volume tolerability was lower in incontinent patients compared with continent patients (P < 0.05). The rectoanal reflex was present in 31 (72%) patients. There was a negative correlation between maximal rectal volume and stool frequency and between level of the anastomosis and degree of incontinence. Age did not affect functional outcome.
CONCLUSION: Many patients had a poor functional result following low anterior resection. One in four suffered from incontinence to liquid or solid faeces and one third of the patients experienced constipation. A low level of anastomosis tended to increase stool frequency and carried a higher risk of incontinence. Patients with faecal incontinence tended to have lower rectal compliance and volume tolerability than patients who were continent, while there was no difference in anal pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12780889     DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00439.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  23 in total

1.  [Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].

Authors:  S Willis; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Quality of life and fecal incontinence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for benign and malignant rectal lesions.

Authors:  Elsa B Valsdottir; Shadi S Yarandi; John H Marks; Gerald J Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer leads to impairment of the anal sphincter.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Werner K-H Kauer; Hjalmar Nekarda; Ludwig Schmid; Hubert J Stein; Joerg-Ruediger Siewert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  [Surgery for rectal cancer].

Authors:  C J Krones; M Stumpf; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Pietro Ursi; Paolo Bruzzone; Andrea Picchetto; Fabrizio I Mattei; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Authors:  Angelo Restivo; Luigi Zorcolo; Giuseppe D'Alia; Francesca Cocco; Andrea Cossu; Francesco Scintu; Giuseppe Casula
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Quality of Life After "Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)" for Rectal Carcinoma: a Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India.

Authors:  Rauf Ahmad Wani; Ikhlaq-Ul-Aziz Bhat; Fazl Qadir Parray; Nisar Ahmad Chowdri
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-25

8.  Quality-of-life impairment after endoluminal locoregional resection and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Emanuele Lezoche; Alessandro M Paganini; Bernardina Fabiani; Andrea Balla; Annarita Vestri; Lorenzo Pescatori; Daniele Scoglio; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Giovanni Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Quality of Life After Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Comparison of Functional Outcomes After Transanal and Laparoscopic Approaches.

Authors:  Maya Xania Bjoern; Sarah Nielsen; Sharaf Karim Perdawood
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Sacral nerve terminal motor latency in patients with or without soiling more than 2 years after low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.