Literature DB >> 24002918

Quality-of-life impairment after endoluminal locoregional resection and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Emanuele Lezoche1, Alessandro M Paganini, Bernardina Fabiani, Andrea Balla, Annarita Vestri, Lorenzo Pescatori, Daniele Scoglio, Giancarlo D'Ambrosio, Giovanni Lezoche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For selected patients with rectal cancer, endoluminal locoregional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME). Few data are available on quality of life (QoL) after LTME and TEM. This study aimed to compare short- and medium-term QoL for T1 rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME or ELRR by TEM.
METHODS: This study investigated 35 patients with T1N0 rectal cancer who underwent TEM (n = 17) or LTME (n = 18). Quality of life was evaluated by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-C38 questionnaires preoperatively and then 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Observation 1 month after LTME showed worsening in all items of both questionnaires. After ELRR, the QLQ-CR38 showed worsening of gastrointestinal (p = 0.005) and defecation problems (p = 0.001), and the QLQ-C30 showed worsening of global health status (p = 0.014), physical functioning (p = 0.02) role functioning (p = 0.003), fatigue (p = 0.002), and pain (p = 0.001). The QLQ-CR38 6 months after LTME showed worsening of body image (p = 0.009), micturition (p = 0.035), and gastrointestinal problems (p = 0.011), and the QLQ-C30 showed worsening of physical functioning (p = 0.003), role functioning (p = 0.002), fatigue (p = 0.004), and nausea/vomiting (p = 0.030). After ELRR, neither the QLQ-CR38 nor the QLQ-C30 questionnaire showed any worsening but demonstrated improvement in global health status and physical functioning. The QLQ-CR38 12 months after LTME showed significant improvement in defecation problems (p = 0.004) and weight loss (p = 0.003), and the QLQ-C30 showed significant improvement in global health status (p = 0.001), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.003), and pain (p = 0.005). After ELRR, the QLQ-C30 showed improvement in emotional functioning (p = 0.012), whereas no significant difference was observed by the QLQ-C38.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional sequelae are present up to 1 month only after ELRR by TEM and up to 6 months after LTME. At 12 months, neither procedure showed a significant difference in QoL compared with preoperative status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002918     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3166-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  49 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised?

Authors:  M L Kennedy; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Capretti; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma.

Authors:  P L Chang; H A Fan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation].

Authors:  G Buess; F Hutterer; J Theiss; M Böbel; W Isselhard; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total mesorectal excision in early rectal cancer.

Authors:  P G Doornebosch; R A E M Tollenaar; M P Gosselink; L P Stassen; C M Dijkhuis; W R Schouten; C J van de Velde; E J R de Graaf
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

8.  Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  W E Enker; H T Thaler; M L Cranor; T Polyak
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study.

Authors:  Chiara Montesani; Annamaria Pronio; Sergio Santella; Arianna Boschetto; Daniele Aguzzi; Roberto Pirozzi; Alberto D'Amato; Annatita Vestri
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 May-Jun

10.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Pietro Ursi; Paolo Bruzzone; Andrea Picchetto; Fabrizio I Mattei; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Authors:  Angelo Restivo; Luigi Zorcolo; Giuseppe D'Alia; Francesca Cocco; Andrea Cossu; Francesco Scintu; Giuseppe Casula
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Tricks to decrease the suture line dehiscence rate during endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Authors:  Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Paolo Bruzzone; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Quality of life in patients with loco-regional rectal cancer after ELRR by TEM versus VLS TME after nChRT: long-term results.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Andrea Picchetto; Salvatore Campo; Rossella Palma; Cristina Panetta; Francesca De Laurentis; Stefania La Rocca; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution.

Authors:  Franco G Marinello; Anna Curell; Ingrid Tapiolas; Gianluca Pellino; Francesc Vallribera; Eloy Espin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Authors:  Nik Dekkers; Hao Dang; Jolein van der Kraan; Saskia le Cessie; Philip P Oldenburg; Jan W Schoones; Alexandra M J Langers; Monique E van Leerdam; Jeanin E van Hooft; Yara Backes; Katarina Levic; Alexander Meining; Giorgio M Saracco; Fabian A Holman; Koen C M J Peeters; Leon M G Moons; Pascal G Doornebosch; James C H Hardwick; Jurjen J Boonstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Long-term oncological outcomes after local excision of T1 rectal cancer.

Authors:  J W A Leijtens; L J H Smits; T W A Koedam; R G Orsini; S M van Aalten; M Verseveld; P G Doornebosch; E J R de Graaf; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Mauro Risio; Simon Bach; Regina Beets-Tan; Krzysztof Bujko; Yves Panis; Philip Quirke; Bjorn Rembacken; Eric Rullier; Yutaka Saito; Tonia Young-Fadok; Marco Ettore Allaix
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.